Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Rigmor C. Berg, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Atle Fretheim, Vigdis Underland, Gunn Vist |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Rigmor C. Berg, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury associated with female genital mutilation/cutting and timing of deinfibulation
by: Sølvi Taraldsen, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Female genital mutilation - from tradition to femicide
by: Rakić Jelena
Published: (2017-01-01) -
The determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters in Nigeria.
by: Charles Echezona Nzelu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Vulvar Epidermoid Cyst and Type 2 Radical Genital Mutilation
by: Ozer Birge, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)