Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849414834012028928 |
|---|---|
| author | Rigmor C. Berg Jan Odgaard-Jensen Atle Fretheim Vigdis Underland Gunn Vist |
| author_facet | Rigmor C. Berg Jan Odgaard-Jensen Atle Fretheim Vigdis Underland Gunn Vist |
| author_sort | Rigmor C. Berg |
| collection | DOAJ |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-729a9fff643f43899fcf42e19a2ed0e0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-9589 1687-9597 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
| spelling | doaj-art-729a9fff643f43899fcf42e19a2ed0e02025-08-20T03:33:42ZengWileyObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/83762608376260Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available EvidenceRigmor C. Berg0Jan Odgaard-Jensen1Atle Fretheim2Vigdis Underland3Gunn Vist4Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, P.O. Box 7004, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norwayhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260 |
| spellingShingle | Rigmor C. Berg Jan Odgaard-Jensen Atle Fretheim Vigdis Underland Gunn Vist Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
| title | Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence |
| title_full | Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence |
| title_fullStr | Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence |
| title_short | Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence |
| title_sort | response to female genital mutilation and obstetric outcomes flawed systematic review and meta analysis does not accurately reflect the available evidence |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8376260 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rigmorcberg responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence AT janodgaardjensen responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence AT atlefretheim responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence AT vigdisunderland responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence AT gunnvist responsetofemalegenitalmutilationandobstetricoutcomesflawedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisdoesnotaccuratelyreflecttheavailableevidence |