Impact of haplo-donor age on transplant outcomes: a comparative analysis of haploidentical vs cord blood transplantation

Abstract: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-matched donors is the gold standard. However, haploidentical stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY-haplo) and cord blood transplants (CBTs) are alternatives when HLA-matched donors are not av...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takashi Nagayama, Shin-ichiro Fujiwara, Satoshi Nishiwaki, Fumiya Wada, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Mamiko Sakata-Yanagimoto, Makoto Onizuka, Kazuya Ishiwata, Yuta Hasegawa, Shuichi Ota, Noriko Doki, Hirohisa Nakamae, Tetsuya Nishida, Toshiro Kawakita, Masashi Sawa, Masahito Tokunaga, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshinobu Kanda, Yoshiko Atsuta, Hideki Nakasone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-07-01
Series:Blood Advances
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2473952925001673
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-matched donors is the gold standard. However, haploidentical stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY-haplo) and cord blood transplants (CBTs) are alternatives when HLA-matched donors are not available. Using Japanese registry data, we evaluated the impact of haploidentical donor age on posttransplant outcomes by comparing PTCY-haplo and CBT. We analyzed data for 5161 patients aged 16 to 70 years who received their first HSCT for acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myeloid leukemia. Haploidentical donors were categorized as “younger” (aged <40 years) or “older” (aged ≥40 years), and the patients were divided into younger (aged <50 years) and older (aged ≥50 years) cohorts. In the older cohort, PTCY-haplo from younger donors had better overall survival (OS; 55.5% vs 50.8%, P = .006), lower nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 17.3% vs 28.6%, P < .001), and higher relapse rates (33.0% vs 24.9%, P = .017) than with CBT. PTCY-haplo from older donors had comparable OS (44.1% vs 50.8%, P = 1.00), NRM (27.3% vs 28.6%, P = 1.00), and relapse (29.2% vs 24.9%, P = .90) to that with CBT. In the younger cohort, PTCY-haplo from younger and older donors showed OS, NRM, and relapse comparable with CBT. In the older cohort, cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher with CBT than with PTCY-haplo, regardless of donor age. However, in the younger cohort, acute GVHD was lower in PTCY-haplo from younger donors than with CBT. PTCY-haplo from younger donors to older patients offers better clinical outcomes than CBT.
ISSN:2473-9529