Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison

ABSTRACT Individuals worldwide share basic affective and cognitive abilities, and receive mental health diagnoses using similar scales. However, these measures have been predominantly developed and validated in Western contexts. Here, we compared British (N = 187; age 19–73 years) and Chinese partic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyin Feng, Rosanna Sheehan, Priyanka Utama, Yixuan Wang, Jiamin Bao, Oliver J. Robinson, Yinyin Zang, Christina O. Carlisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Mental Health Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.70020
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850161028923392000
author Boyin Feng
Rosanna Sheehan
Priyanka Utama
Yixuan Wang
Jiamin Bao
Oliver J. Robinson
Yinyin Zang
Christina O. Carlisi
author_facet Boyin Feng
Rosanna Sheehan
Priyanka Utama
Yixuan Wang
Jiamin Bao
Oliver J. Robinson
Yinyin Zang
Christina O. Carlisi
author_sort Boyin Feng
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Individuals worldwide share basic affective and cognitive abilities, and receive mental health diagnoses using similar scales. However, these measures have been predominantly developed and validated in Western contexts. Here, we compared British (N = 187; age 19–73 years) and Chinese participants (N = 194; age 19–60 years) on behavioral tasks of facial emotion recognition and sustained attention, evaluating affect and cognition, as well as mental health measures of anxiety, depression, obsessive‐compulsive disorder, and impulsivity. Comparing British and Chinese populations is particularly important as they represent distinct cultural traditions in emotional expression, cognitive processing, and mental health conceptualization. We found that British participants were significantly better at recognizing emotions, especially negative ones; while Chinese participants showed higher obsessive‐compulsive symptoms, driven primarily by the number‐meaning item, the tendency to assign significance to numerical information. The groups showed negligible differences in sustained attention and other mental health measures. This study provides novel evidence that culture has a greater influence on affective abilities than cognitive ones, and highlights concerns about cultural biases in established mental health scales. However, these findings may not generalize beyond British and Chinese populations, which calls for broader cross‐cultural research.
format Article
id doaj-art-71eee8f0286d4400a1a125b989c15916
institution OA Journals
issn 2642-3588
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Mental Health Science
spelling doaj-art-71eee8f0286d4400a1a125b989c159162025-08-20T02:22:59ZengWileyMental Health Science2642-35882025-06-0132n/an/a10.1002/mhs2.70020Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese ComparisonBoyin Feng0Rosanna Sheehan1Priyanka Utama2Yixuan Wang3Jiamin Bao4Oliver J. Robinson5Yinyin Zang6Christina O. Carlisi7Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UKResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UKResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UKBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Philosophy Building, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Philosophy Building, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UKBeijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Philosophy Building, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UKABSTRACT Individuals worldwide share basic affective and cognitive abilities, and receive mental health diagnoses using similar scales. However, these measures have been predominantly developed and validated in Western contexts. Here, we compared British (N = 187; age 19–73 years) and Chinese participants (N = 194; age 19–60 years) on behavioral tasks of facial emotion recognition and sustained attention, evaluating affect and cognition, as well as mental health measures of anxiety, depression, obsessive‐compulsive disorder, and impulsivity. Comparing British and Chinese populations is particularly important as they represent distinct cultural traditions in emotional expression, cognitive processing, and mental health conceptualization. We found that British participants were significantly better at recognizing emotions, especially negative ones; while Chinese participants showed higher obsessive‐compulsive symptoms, driven primarily by the number‐meaning item, the tendency to assign significance to numerical information. The groups showed negligible differences in sustained attention and other mental health measures. This study provides novel evidence that culture has a greater influence on affective abilities than cognitive ones, and highlights concerns about cultural biases in established mental health scales. However, these findings may not generalize beyond British and Chinese populations, which calls for broader cross‐cultural research.https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.70020context effectscultural differencesemotion recognitionmental healthpsychopathologysustained attention
spellingShingle Boyin Feng
Rosanna Sheehan
Priyanka Utama
Yixuan Wang
Jiamin Bao
Oliver J. Robinson
Yinyin Zang
Christina O. Carlisi
Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
Mental Health Science
context effects
cultural differences
emotion recognition
mental health
psychopathology
sustained attention
title Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
title_full Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
title_fullStr Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
title_short Cross‐Cultural Differences on Affective, Cognitive, and Psychiatric Measures: Evidence From a British‐Chinese Comparison
title_sort cross cultural differences on affective cognitive and psychiatric measures evidence from a british chinese comparison
topic context effects
cultural differences
emotion recognition
mental health
psychopathology
sustained attention
url https://doi.org/10.1002/mhs2.70020
work_keys_str_mv AT boyinfeng crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT rosannasheehan crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT priyankautama crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT yixuanwang crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT jiaminbao crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT oliverjrobinson crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT yinyinzang crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison
AT christinaocarlisi crossculturaldifferencesonaffectivecognitiveandpsychiatricmeasuresevidencefromabritishchinesecomparison