Self- versus clinician-collected swabs in anal cancer screening: A clinical trial.
<h4>Background</h4>Risk of anal cancer is high in certain populations and screening involves collection of anal swabs for HPV DNA and/or cytology testing. However, barriers exist, such as the need for an intimate examination, and stigma around HIV status, sexual orientation, and sexual p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Clare E F Dyer, Fengyi Jin, Jennifer M Roberts, I Mary Poynten, Annabelle Farnsworth, Leon P McNally, Philip H Cunningham, Andrew E Grulich, Richard J Hillman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312781 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Efficacy of SG Shield in reducing droplet contamination during collection of oropharyngeal swab culture specimens
by: Phui-Sze Angie Au-Yong, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
No Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on Urethral Swab in Patients with Positive Nasopharyngeal Swab
by: Lorenzo Spirito, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Comparison of self-collected and healthcare worker-collected rectovaginal swabs for group B streptococcus detection in pregnancy using PCR with a commercial collection-enrichment device
by: Iva Kukovica, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Rebalancing the Economy, Refurbishing the State: The Political Economic Logic of Sino-Capitalism in Contemporary China
by: Christopher A. McNally
Published: (2017-09-01) -
A Curious Case of Intestinal Diaphragm Disease Unmasked by Perforation of a Duodenal Ulcer
by: Mairéad McNally, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)