How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,000 submitting authors and 9,000 submitted papers, we surveyed the authors on three questions: (i) their predicted proba...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Alina Beygelzimer, Yann N Dauphin, Percy Liang, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Zhenyu Xue, Hal Daumé Iii, Emma Pierson, Nihar B Shah |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300710 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions.
by: Ivan Stelmakh, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Index of Authors and papers published in 2012
by: Editorial Article
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Index of Authors and Papers Published in 2019
by: Editorial Article
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Index of Authors and Papers Published in 2016
by: Editorial Article
Published: (2020-05-01)