Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction
COVID-19 intensified interest in telemedicine, yet no study has evaluated the use of a telepresence robot on unselected urological patients. Therefore, we performed a survey study of patients, bedside caregivers and urologists, investigating the satisfaction and applicability of a telepresence robot...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8787882 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832564891944222720 |
---|---|
author | Jens Laigaard Trine Ungermann Fredskild Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki |
author_facet | Jens Laigaard Trine Ungermann Fredskild Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki |
author_sort | Jens Laigaard |
collection | DOAJ |
description | COVID-19 intensified interest in telemedicine, yet no study has evaluated the use of a telepresence robot on unselected urological patients. Therefore, we performed a survey study of patients, bedside caregivers and urologists, investigating the satisfaction and applicability of a telepresence robot (Beam Pro, Suitable Technologies, USA) at the urology ward and emergency department. The primary outcome was the number of patient encounters solved without the urologist’s physical presence. Between March 2021 and May 2021, patients, caregivers, and urologists filled in 42, 35, and 54 questionnaires, respectively. Most patients were male (79%), with a mean age of 64 (SD±17). Two of the department’s ten urologists participated. The urologists responded that physical examination was required in 7 (13%) encounters. The caregivers would have preferred the urologist physically present in 11 (31%) cases. Most patients (71%) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that they were willing to be attended by a telepresence robot at future evaluations and generally, patients gave high satisfaction scores. Though implementation among the department’s urologists was a major challenge, participating urologists reported that physical presence could be avoided in 87% of the patient encounters. Studies of patient-reported outcome measures comparing telemedical and physical patient encounters are needed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-71c9f9d445d843e197861b021438a9c1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-6423 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
spelling | doaj-art-71c9f9d445d843e197861b021438a9c12025-02-03T01:09:55ZengWileyInternational Journal of Telemedicine and Applications1687-64232022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8787882Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ SatisfactionJens Laigaard0Trine Ungermann Fredskild1Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki2Department of UrologyThe Learning and Research DepartmentDepartment of UrologyCOVID-19 intensified interest in telemedicine, yet no study has evaluated the use of a telepresence robot on unselected urological patients. Therefore, we performed a survey study of patients, bedside caregivers and urologists, investigating the satisfaction and applicability of a telepresence robot (Beam Pro, Suitable Technologies, USA) at the urology ward and emergency department. The primary outcome was the number of patient encounters solved without the urologist’s physical presence. Between March 2021 and May 2021, patients, caregivers, and urologists filled in 42, 35, and 54 questionnaires, respectively. Most patients were male (79%), with a mean age of 64 (SD±17). Two of the department’s ten urologists participated. The urologists responded that physical examination was required in 7 (13%) encounters. The caregivers would have preferred the urologist physically present in 11 (31%) cases. Most patients (71%) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that they were willing to be attended by a telepresence robot at future evaluations and generally, patients gave high satisfaction scores. Though implementation among the department’s urologists was a major challenge, participating urologists reported that physical presence could be avoided in 87% of the patient encounters. Studies of patient-reported outcome measures comparing telemedical and physical patient encounters are needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8787882 |
spellingShingle | Jens Laigaard Trine Ungermann Fredskild Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
title | Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction |
title_full | Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction |
title_fullStr | Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction |
title_short | Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients’ and Healthcare Workers’ Satisfaction |
title_sort | telepresence robots at the urology and emergency department a pilot study assessing patients and healthcare workers satisfaction |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8787882 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenslaigaard telepresencerobotsattheurologyandemergencydepartmentapilotstudyassessingpatientsandhealthcareworkerssatisfaction AT trineungermannfredskild telepresencerobotsattheurologyandemergencydepartmentapilotstudyassessingpatientsandhealthcareworkerssatisfaction AT grzegorzlukaszfojecki telepresencerobotsattheurologyandemergencydepartmentapilotstudyassessingpatientsandhealthcareworkerssatisfaction |