„Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer

Bakhtin asserted that Dostoevsky’s most direct link to varieties of ancient Menippea was Christian literature, such as the Gospels or the Apocalypse. However, Bakhtin does not elaborate upon the Menippean aspects of these works which could have served as templates for Dostoevsky’s own. Whereas Bakht...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruth Karin Lévai
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT 2025-02-01
Series:Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
Subjects:
Online Access:https://linguistische-treffen.pl/articles/26/06_levai.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540799975292928
author Ruth Karin Lévai
author_facet Ruth Karin Lévai
author_sort Ruth Karin Lévai
collection DOAJ
description Bakhtin asserted that Dostoevsky’s most direct link to varieties of ancient Menippea was Christian literature, such as the Gospels or the Apocalypse. However, Bakhtin does not elaborate upon the Menippean aspects of these works which could have served as templates for Dostoevsky’s own. Whereas Bakhtin believed that, “The Menippean forms are based on man’s inability to know and contain his fate,” the case of the Pharisees in the Gospels was a bit more complex. The serio-comedy of the Pharisees was created by the ability of the God-man to know and contain their fate. In the end, what Bakhtin termed the “reduced laughter” of Stepan Trofimovich’s case comes from the same source. This paper examines Stepan Trofimovich as the embodiment of the Menippean elements of Jesus’ interactions with the Pharisees in the Gospels, focusing specifically on the journey of Stepan Trofimovich’s idea as it is introduced in “Instead of an Introduction” to its ultimate defeat in his “last peregrination.” Five specific aspects of the Menippea as defined by Bakhtin are employed in the analysis: 1) the absence of epic or tragic distance, with the subject presented on the plane of the present day, 2) the bold and unrestrained use of the fantastic and adventure devoted to a purely ideational and philosophical end, 3) insanity of all sorts, 4) no abstractly philosophical or religiously dogmatic resolution to ultimate questions, rather their embodiment in carnivalistic acts and images, and 5) the creation of an extraordinary plot situation or a provocative anacrisis.
format Article
id doaj-art-71c74b1a499a4cdc8e28a5e00e716270
institution Kabale University
issn 2084-3062
2657-5647
language deu
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT
record_format Article
series Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
spelling doaj-art-71c74b1a499a4cdc8e28a5e00e7162702025-02-04T14:38:05ZdeuOficyna Wydawnicza ATUTLinguistische Treffen in Wrocław2084-30622657-56472025-02-0126210511410.23817/lingtreff.26-6„Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der PharisäerRuth Karin Lévai0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2832-8959University of MiskolcBakhtin asserted that Dostoevsky’s most direct link to varieties of ancient Menippea was Christian literature, such as the Gospels or the Apocalypse. However, Bakhtin does not elaborate upon the Menippean aspects of these works which could have served as templates for Dostoevsky’s own. Whereas Bakhtin believed that, “The Menippean forms are based on man’s inability to know and contain his fate,” the case of the Pharisees in the Gospels was a bit more complex. The serio-comedy of the Pharisees was created by the ability of the God-man to know and contain their fate. In the end, what Bakhtin termed the “reduced laughter” of Stepan Trofimovich’s case comes from the same source. This paper examines Stepan Trofimovich as the embodiment of the Menippean elements of Jesus’ interactions with the Pharisees in the Gospels, focusing specifically on the journey of Stepan Trofimovich’s idea as it is introduced in “Instead of an Introduction” to its ultimate defeat in his “last peregrination.” Five specific aspects of the Menippea as defined by Bakhtin are employed in the analysis: 1) the absence of epic or tragic distance, with the subject presented on the plane of the present day, 2) the bold and unrestrained use of the fantastic and adventure devoted to a purely ideational and philosophical end, 3) insanity of all sorts, 4) no abstractly philosophical or religiously dogmatic resolution to ultimate questions, rather their embodiment in carnivalistic acts and images, and 5) the creation of an extraordinary plot situation or a provocative anacrisis.https://linguistische-treffen.pl/articles/26/06_levai.pdfdostoevskybakhtinmenippeaphariseesdemonsstepan trofimovich
spellingShingle Ruth Karin Lévai
„Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
dostoevsky
bakhtin
menippea
pharisees
demons
stepan trofimovich
title „Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
title_full „Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
title_fullStr „Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
title_full_unstemmed „Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
title_short „Anwärter auf die Hölle“: Stepan Trofimowitsch und die Menippea der Pharisäer
title_sort anwarter auf die holle stepan trofimowitsch und die menippea der pharisaer
topic dostoevsky
bakhtin
menippea
pharisees
demons
stepan trofimovich
url https://linguistische-treffen.pl/articles/26/06_levai.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthkarinlevai anwarteraufdiehollestepantrofimowitschunddiemenippeaderpharisaer