Setting the foundation for a national collaborative learning health system in acute TBI rehabilitation: CARE4TBI Year 1 experience

Abstract Introduction A learning health system (LHS) approach is a collaborative model that continuously examines, evaluates, and re‐evaluates data eventually transforming it into knowledge. High quantity of high‐quality data are needed to establish this model. The purpose of this article is to desc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cynthia L. Beaulieu, Jennifer Bogner, Chad Swank, Kimberly Frey, Mary K. Ferraro, Candace Tefertiller, Timothy R. Huerta, John D. Corrigan, Erinn M. Hade
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Learning Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10454
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction A learning health system (LHS) approach is a collaborative model that continuously examines, evaluates, and re‐evaluates data eventually transforming it into knowledge. High quantity of high‐quality data are needed to establish this model. The purpose of this article is to describe the collaborative discovery process used to identify and standardize clinical data documented during daily multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation that would then allow access to these data to conduct comparative effectiveness research. Methods CARE4TBI is a prospective observational research study designed to capture clinical data within the standard inpatient rehabilitation documentation workflow at 15 TBI Model Systems Centers in the US. Three groups of stakeholders guided project development: therapy representative work group (TRWG) consisting of frontline therapists from occupational, physical, speech‐language, and recreational therapies; rehabilitation leader representative group (RLRG); and informatics and information technology team (IIT). Over a 12‐month period, the three work groups and research leadership team identified the therapeutic components captured within daily documentation throughout the duration of inpatient TBI rehabilitation. Results Data brainstorming among the groups created 98 distinct categories of data with each containing a range of data elements comprising a total of 850 discrete data elements. The free‐form data were sorted into three large categories and through review and discussion, reduced to two categories of prospective data collection—session‐level and therapy activity‐level data. Twelve session data elements were identified, and 54 therapy activities were identified, with each activity containing discrete sub‐categories for activity components, method of delivery, and equipment or supplies. A total of 561 distinct meaningful data elements were identified across the 54 activities. Discussion The CARE4TBI data discovery process demonstrated feasibility in identifying and capturing meaningful high quantity and high‐quality treatment data across multiple disciplines and rehabilitation sites, setting the foundation for a LHS coalition for acute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.
ISSN:2379-6146