Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in treating small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) and determine the role of PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies in improving patient outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 SCLC patients who receive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qichen Zhang, Xiaojuan Han, Jiayi Liu, Hui Qiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Cancer Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.70081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577747878150144
author Qichen Zhang
Xiaojuan Han
Jiayi Liu
Hui Qiao
author_facet Qichen Zhang
Xiaojuan Han
Jiayi Liu
Hui Qiao
author_sort Qichen Zhang
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in treating small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) and determine the role of PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies in improving patient outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 SCLC patients who received PD‐1 or PD‐L1 inhibitors along with chemotherapy at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between June 2018 and June 2023. Treatment effectiveness was measured by overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS), utilizing chi‐square and T‐tests, along with Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank analyses. Results In the PD‐L1 group, 16 patients achieved partial or complete response, versus 12 in the PD‐1 group, though the difference in the ORR was not statistically significant (50.0% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.308). Median survival times were 21.0 months for PD‐L1 and 17.0 months for PD‐1, with no statistically meaningful difference (p = 0.180). Adverse effects were comparable between the groups in terms of thyroid function (p = 0.898), but bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reactions were significantly less severe in the PD‐L1 group (p = 0.047 and p = 0.002). Conclusion Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy offers significant benefits for advanced SCLC patients, irrespective of the type of inhibitor used. Despite the higher incidence of adverse reactions with PD‐1 inhibitors, they remain a viable option, particularly when PD‐L1 inhibitors are not available, due to their manageable safety profile and effective response.
format Article
id doaj-art-715679c64c0647f685e38708b4f85227
institution Kabale University
issn 2573-8348
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Reports
spelling doaj-art-715679c64c0647f685e38708b4f852272025-01-30T15:46:35ZengWileyCancer Reports2573-83482025-01-0181n/an/a10.1002/cnr2.70081Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung CancerQichen Zhang0Xiaojuan Han1Jiayi Liu2Hui Qiao3The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaDepartment of Oncology The First Hospital of Lanzhou University Lanzhou ChinaABSTRACT Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in treating small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) and determine the role of PD‐1 monoclonal antibodies in improving patient outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 SCLC patients who received PD‐1 or PD‐L1 inhibitors along with chemotherapy at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between June 2018 and June 2023. Treatment effectiveness was measured by overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS), utilizing chi‐square and T‐tests, along with Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank analyses. Results In the PD‐L1 group, 16 patients achieved partial or complete response, versus 12 in the PD‐1 group, though the difference in the ORR was not statistically significant (50.0% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.308). Median survival times were 21.0 months for PD‐L1 and 17.0 months for PD‐1, with no statistically meaningful difference (p = 0.180). Adverse effects were comparable between the groups in terms of thyroid function (p = 0.898), but bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reactions were significantly less severe in the PD‐L1 group (p = 0.047 and p = 0.002). Conclusion Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy offers significant benefits for advanced SCLC patients, irrespective of the type of inhibitor used. Despite the higher incidence of adverse reactions with PD‐1 inhibitors, they remain a viable option, particularly when PD‐L1 inhibitors are not available, due to their manageable safety profile and effective response.https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.70081adverse reactionsefficacy evaluationPD‐L1/PD‐1small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
spellingShingle Qichen Zhang
Xiaojuan Han
Jiayi Liu
Hui Qiao
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
Cancer Reports
adverse reactions
efficacy evaluation
PD‐L1/PD‐1
small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of pd 1 pd l1 inhibitors in the treatment of small cell lung cancer
topic adverse reactions
efficacy evaluation
PD‐L1/PD‐1
small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.70081
work_keys_str_mv AT qichenzhang comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofpd1pdl1inhibitorsinthetreatmentofsmallcelllungcancer
AT xiaojuanhan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofpd1pdl1inhibitorsinthetreatmentofsmallcelllungcancer
AT jiayiliu comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofpd1pdl1inhibitorsinthetreatmentofsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiqiao comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofpd1pdl1inhibitorsinthetreatmentofsmallcelllungcancer