Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter

Abstract Objective To evaluate via a review of published literature, the efficacy of endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the following ureteric diseases: urolithiasis, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stricture disease and pelvic‐ureteric junction obstruction (PU...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Sii, Jeremy Bolton, Jake Tempo, Damien Bolton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-06-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.352
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850134906024230912
author Samuel Sii
Jeremy Bolton
Jake Tempo
Damien Bolton
author_facet Samuel Sii
Jeremy Bolton
Jake Tempo
Damien Bolton
author_sort Samuel Sii
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To evaluate via a review of published literature, the efficacy of endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the following ureteric diseases: urolithiasis, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stricture disease and pelvic‐ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). Patients and methods Ureteric high‐frequency ELUS provides 360° imaging, to a depth of 20 mm, and has been demonstrated to assess ureteric stricture length, degree of fibrosis and aetiology. OCT produces high‐quality images with a penetration depth of 2 mm. ELUS has proven to be useful at the time of endopyelotomy for PUJO as it can identify crossing vessels, some not detectable on CT angiography, allowing the urologist to avoid these when making their incision. Ureteric ELUS may be utilised for submucosal ureteric stones as they are highly visible. Endoluminal ultrasound may be deployed in the case of known sub‐mucosal urolithiasis when the ureter appears stone‐free. It may help identify sub‐mucosal stones or stones within diverticulum. Results Endoluminal ultrasound has been analysed for its use in determining muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. The PPV for ≥pT2 was only 16.7% in one study of six patients with MIBC and 76.2% in 21 patients with <pT2 disease. Analysis of OCT for staging UTUC during ureteroscopy and biopsy demonstrated sensitivity for tumour invasion of 100% and specificity of 92%, 83% of lesion staging matched with histological analysis. Imaging analysis did not match histology in three patients with large exophytic tumours that exceeded the OCT depth penetration. Due to its superficial penetration, OCT cannot reliably stage large tumours. Conclusions Ureteric ELUS has been reported to be a useful tool in endopyelotomy, urolithiasis and stricture disease. The staging of ureteric urothelial carcinoma remains unsatisfactory with current imaging techniques and biopsy methods, and, based on the current literature, ELUS does not appear to have a strong enough PPV to determine muscle invasion. Ureteric OCT may be a useful tool in the future staging of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, particularly in differentiating the stage of small tumours. Further studies are needed in this area.
format Article
id doaj-art-70fe05714f2b4e1cb5f9889db413dceb
institution OA Journals
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-70fe05714f2b4e1cb5f9889db413dceb2025-08-20T02:31:36ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262024-06-015662863710.1002/bco2.352Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureterSamuel Sii0Jeremy Bolton1Jake Tempo2Damien Bolton3Department of Surgery University of Melbourne, Austin Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaMonash University Melbourne Victoria AustraliaDepartment of Surgery University of Melbourne, Austin Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaDepartment of Surgery University of Melbourne, Austin Health Melbourne Victoria AustraliaAbstract Objective To evaluate via a review of published literature, the efficacy of endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the following ureteric diseases: urolithiasis, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stricture disease and pelvic‐ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). Patients and methods Ureteric high‐frequency ELUS provides 360° imaging, to a depth of 20 mm, and has been demonstrated to assess ureteric stricture length, degree of fibrosis and aetiology. OCT produces high‐quality images with a penetration depth of 2 mm. ELUS has proven to be useful at the time of endopyelotomy for PUJO as it can identify crossing vessels, some not detectable on CT angiography, allowing the urologist to avoid these when making their incision. Ureteric ELUS may be utilised for submucosal ureteric stones as they are highly visible. Endoluminal ultrasound may be deployed in the case of known sub‐mucosal urolithiasis when the ureter appears stone‐free. It may help identify sub‐mucosal stones or stones within diverticulum. Results Endoluminal ultrasound has been analysed for its use in determining muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma of the ureter. The PPV for ≥pT2 was only 16.7% in one study of six patients with MIBC and 76.2% in 21 patients with <pT2 disease. Analysis of OCT for staging UTUC during ureteroscopy and biopsy demonstrated sensitivity for tumour invasion of 100% and specificity of 92%, 83% of lesion staging matched with histological analysis. Imaging analysis did not match histology in three patients with large exophytic tumours that exceeded the OCT depth penetration. Due to its superficial penetration, OCT cannot reliably stage large tumours. Conclusions Ureteric ELUS has been reported to be a useful tool in endopyelotomy, urolithiasis and stricture disease. The staging of ureteric urothelial carcinoma remains unsatisfactory with current imaging techniques and biopsy methods, and, based on the current literature, ELUS does not appear to have a strong enough PPV to determine muscle invasion. Ureteric OCT may be a useful tool in the future staging of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, particularly in differentiating the stage of small tumours. Further studies are needed in this area.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.352endoluminal ultrasoundoptical coherence tomographyureter
spellingShingle Samuel Sii
Jeremy Bolton
Jake Tempo
Damien Bolton
Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
BJUI Compass
endoluminal ultrasound
optical coherence tomography
ureter
title Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
title_full Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
title_fullStr Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
title_short Contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
title_sort contemporary status of diagnostic endoluminal ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in the ureter
topic endoluminal ultrasound
optical coherence tomography
ureter
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.352
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelsii contemporarystatusofdiagnosticendoluminalultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomographyintheureter
AT jeremybolton contemporarystatusofdiagnosticendoluminalultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomographyintheureter
AT jaketempo contemporarystatusofdiagnosticendoluminalultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomographyintheureter
AT damienbolton contemporarystatusofdiagnosticendoluminalultrasoundandopticalcoherencetomographyintheureter