A general framework for governing marketed AI/ML medical devices
Abstract This project represents the first systematic assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration’s postmarket surveillance of legally marketed artificial intelligence and machine learning based medical devices. We focus on the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database—the FDA’...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | npj Digital Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01717-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract This project represents the first systematic assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration’s postmarket surveillance of legally marketed artificial intelligence and machine learning based medical devices. We focus on the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database—the FDA’s central tool for tracking the safety of marketed AI/ML devices. In particular, we evaluate the data pertaining to adverse events associated with approximately 950 medical devices incorporating AI/ML functions for devices approved between 2010 through 2023, and we find that the existing system is insufficient for properly assessing the safety and effectiveness of AI/ML devices. In particular, we make three contributions: (1) characterize the adverse event reports for such devices, (2) examine the ways in which the existing FDA adverse reporting system for medical devices falls short, and (3) suggest changes FDA might consider in its approach to adverse event reporting for devices incorporating AI/ML functions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2398-6352 |