The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is estimated to have affected 6.2 million people in the United States and 27.5 million people worldwide as of September 9, 2020. On February 2, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Servi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Joyce, Lynsey Seim, Michael Smerina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688303
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849414078208933888
author Nicole Joyce
Lynsey Seim
Michael Smerina
author_facet Nicole Joyce
Lynsey Seim
Michael Smerina
author_sort Nicole Joyce
collection DOAJ
description The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is estimated to have affected 6.2 million people in the United States and 27.5 million people worldwide as of September 9, 2020. On February 2, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that the public health emergency justified the development and emergency use of “in vitro diagnostics for the detection and/or diagnosis of the virus that causes COVID-19” by activating the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Unfortunately, effective mitigation efforts were thwarted early in the outbreak resulting in an expansion of the initial EUA on February 29, 2020, to improve accessibility to in vitro diagnostic testing. Expectantly, the development and deployment of SARS-CoV-2 testing including RT-PCR expanded rapidly in the weeks following the EUA expansion. These newly developed and approved SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests boast impressive positive and negative agreement rates nearing 100%. Despite the exceptionally high rates of agreement, caution is advised as the RT-PCR tests approved under the COVID-19 EUA are in vitro analyses developed with samples artificially doped with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. These tests therefore do not have clinically applicable sensitivity and specificity because they lack a “gold standard” for diagnosis. Here we present three challenging cases requiring cautious interpretation of the newest generation of RT-PCR molecular detection assays, highlighting the major challenges faced by providers treating patients potentially infected with SARS-CoV-2.
format Article
id doaj-art-70c2debbc996442492883d64a6ec4b7e
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9627
1687-9635
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-70c2debbc996442492883d64a6ec4b7e2025-08-20T03:33:57ZengWileyCase Reports in Medicine1687-96271687-96352021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66883036688303The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) TestingNicole Joyce0Lynsey Seim1Michael Smerina2Assistant Professor of Medicine, Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USAAssistant Professor of Medicine, Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USAAssistant Professor of Medicine, Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USAThe COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is estimated to have affected 6.2 million people in the United States and 27.5 million people worldwide as of September 9, 2020. On February 2, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that the public health emergency justified the development and emergency use of “in vitro diagnostics for the detection and/or diagnosis of the virus that causes COVID-19” by activating the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Unfortunately, effective mitigation efforts were thwarted early in the outbreak resulting in an expansion of the initial EUA on February 29, 2020, to improve accessibility to in vitro diagnostic testing. Expectantly, the development and deployment of SARS-CoV-2 testing including RT-PCR expanded rapidly in the weeks following the EUA expansion. These newly developed and approved SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests boast impressive positive and negative agreement rates nearing 100%. Despite the exceptionally high rates of agreement, caution is advised as the RT-PCR tests approved under the COVID-19 EUA are in vitro analyses developed with samples artificially doped with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. These tests therefore do not have clinically applicable sensitivity and specificity because they lack a “gold standard” for diagnosis. Here we present three challenging cases requiring cautious interpretation of the newest generation of RT-PCR molecular detection assays, highlighting the major challenges faced by providers treating patients potentially infected with SARS-CoV-2.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688303
spellingShingle Nicole Joyce
Lynsey Seim
Michael Smerina
The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
Case Reports in Medicine
title The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
title_full The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
title_fullStr The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
title_full_unstemmed The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
title_short The Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) Testing
title_sort dynamics of sars cov 2 rt pcr testing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688303
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolejoyce thedynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting
AT lynseyseim thedynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting
AT michaelsmerina thedynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting
AT nicolejoyce dynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting
AT lynseyseim dynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting
AT michaelsmerina dynamicsofsarscov2rtpcrtesting