Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis.
<h4>Background</h4>In a recent individual patient data meta-analysis, acupuncture was found to be superior to both sham and non-sham controls in patients with chronic pain. In this paper we identify variations in types of sham and non-sham controls used and analyze their impact on the ef...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093739 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850125103197585408 |
|---|---|
| author | Hugh MacPherson Emily Vertosick George Lewith Klaus Linde Karen J Sherman Claudia M Witt Andrew J Vickers Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration |
| author_facet | Hugh MacPherson Emily Vertosick George Lewith Klaus Linde Karen J Sherman Claudia M Witt Andrew J Vickers Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration |
| author_sort | Hugh MacPherson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>In a recent individual patient data meta-analysis, acupuncture was found to be superior to both sham and non-sham controls in patients with chronic pain. In this paper we identify variations in types of sham and non-sham controls used and analyze their impact on the effect size of acupuncture.<h4>Methods</h4>Based on literature searches of acupuncture trials involving patients with headache and migraine, osteoarthritis, and back, neck and shoulder pain, 29 trials met inclusion criteria, 20 involving sham controls (n = 5,230) and 18 non-sham controls (n = 14,597). For sham controls, we analysed non-needle sham, penetrating sham needles and non-penetrating sham needles. For non-sham controls, we analysed non-specified routine care and protocol-guided care. Using meta-regression we explored impact of choice of control on effect of acupuncture.<h4>Findings</h4>Acupuncture was significantly superior to all categories of control group. For trials that used penetrating needles for sham control, acupuncture had smaller effect sizes than for trials with non-penetrating sham or sham control without needles. The difference in effect size was -0.45 (95% C.I. -0.78, -0.12; p = 0.007), or -0.19 (95% C.I. -0.39, 0.01; p = 0.058) after exclusion of outlying studies showing very large effects of acupuncture. In trials with non-sham controls, larger effect sizes associated with acupuncture vs. non-specified routine care than vs. protocol-guided care. Although the difference in effect size was large (0.26), it was not significant with a wide confidence interval (95% C.I. -0.05, 0.57, p = 0.1).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Acupuncture is significantly superior to control irrespective of the subtype of control. While the choice of control should be driven by the study question, our findings can help inform study design in acupuncture, particularly with respect to sample size. Penetrating needles appear to have important physiologic activity. We recommend that this type of sham be avoided. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-70b4c1ebbb2d40f3962bea71be230d65 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-70b4c1ebbb2d40f3962bea71be230d652025-08-20T02:34:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9373910.1371/journal.pone.0093739Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis.Hugh MacPhersonEmily VertosickGeorge LewithKlaus LindeKaren J ShermanClaudia M WittAndrew J VickersAcupuncture Trialists' Collaboration<h4>Background</h4>In a recent individual patient data meta-analysis, acupuncture was found to be superior to both sham and non-sham controls in patients with chronic pain. In this paper we identify variations in types of sham and non-sham controls used and analyze their impact on the effect size of acupuncture.<h4>Methods</h4>Based on literature searches of acupuncture trials involving patients with headache and migraine, osteoarthritis, and back, neck and shoulder pain, 29 trials met inclusion criteria, 20 involving sham controls (n = 5,230) and 18 non-sham controls (n = 14,597). For sham controls, we analysed non-needle sham, penetrating sham needles and non-penetrating sham needles. For non-sham controls, we analysed non-specified routine care and protocol-guided care. Using meta-regression we explored impact of choice of control on effect of acupuncture.<h4>Findings</h4>Acupuncture was significantly superior to all categories of control group. For trials that used penetrating needles for sham control, acupuncture had smaller effect sizes than for trials with non-penetrating sham or sham control without needles. The difference in effect size was -0.45 (95% C.I. -0.78, -0.12; p = 0.007), or -0.19 (95% C.I. -0.39, 0.01; p = 0.058) after exclusion of outlying studies showing very large effects of acupuncture. In trials with non-sham controls, larger effect sizes associated with acupuncture vs. non-specified routine care than vs. protocol-guided care. Although the difference in effect size was large (0.26), it was not significant with a wide confidence interval (95% C.I. -0.05, 0.57, p = 0.1).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Acupuncture is significantly superior to control irrespective of the subtype of control. While the choice of control should be driven by the study question, our findings can help inform study design in acupuncture, particularly with respect to sample size. Penetrating needles appear to have important physiologic activity. We recommend that this type of sham be avoided.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093739 |
| spellingShingle | Hugh MacPherson Emily Vertosick George Lewith Klaus Linde Karen J Sherman Claudia M Witt Andrew J Vickers Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. |
| title_full | Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. |
| title_short | Influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. |
| title_sort | influence of control group on effect size in trials of acupuncture for chronic pain a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093739 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hughmacpherson influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT emilyvertosick influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT georgelewith influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT klauslinde influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT karenjsherman influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT claudiamwitt influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT andrewjvickers influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT acupuncturetrialistscollaboration influenceofcontrolgrouponeffectsizeintrialsofacupunctureforchronicpainasecondaryanalysisofanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis |