Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry

Background. Inappropriate cardiac catheterization lab activation together with false-positive angiographies and no-culprit found coronary interventions are now reported as costly to the medical system, influencing STEMI process efficiency. We aimed to analyze data from a high-volume interventional c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandru Burlacu, Grigore Tinica, Bogdan Artene, Paul Simion, Diana Savuc, Adrian Covic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9839281
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850221200697982976
author Alexandru Burlacu
Grigore Tinica
Bogdan Artene
Paul Simion
Diana Savuc
Adrian Covic
author_facet Alexandru Burlacu
Grigore Tinica
Bogdan Artene
Paul Simion
Diana Savuc
Adrian Covic
author_sort Alexandru Burlacu
collection DOAJ
description Background. Inappropriate cardiac catheterization lab activation together with false-positive angiographies and no-culprit found coronary interventions are now reported as costly to the medical system, influencing STEMI process efficiency. We aimed to analyze data from a high-volume interventional centre (>1000 primary PCIs/year) exploring etiologies and reporting characteristics from all “blank” coronary angiographies in STEMI. Methods. In this retrospective observational single-centre cohort study, we reported two-year data from a primary PCI registry (2035 patients). “Angio-only” cases were assigned to one of these categories: (a) Takotsubo syndrome; (b) coronary embolisation; (c) myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries; (d) myocarditis; (e) CABG-referred; (f) normal coronary arteries (mostly diagnostic errors); and (g)others (refusals and death prior angioplasty). Univariate analysis assessed correlations between each category and cardiovascular risk factors. Results. 412 STEMI patients received coronary angiography “only,” accounting for 20.2% of cath lab activations. Barely 77 patients had diagnostic errors (3.8% from all patients) implying false-activations. 40% of “angio-only” patients (n = 165) were referred to surgery due to severe atherosclerosis or mechanical complications. Patients with diagnostic errors and normal arteries displayed strong correlations with all cardiovascular risk factors. Probably, numerous risk factors “convinced” emergency department staff to call for an angio. Conclusions. STEMI network professionals often confront with coronary angiography “only” situations. We propose a classification according to etiologies. Next, STEMI guidelines should include audit recommendations and specific thresholds regarding “angio-only” patients, with specific focus on MINOCA, CABG referrals, and diagnostic errors. These measures will have a double impact: a better management of the patient, and a clearer perception about the usefulness of the investments.
format Article
id doaj-art-707b85794c8b4db5afca012bcb9d2f8b
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-2840
2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-707b85794c8b4db5afca012bcb9d2f8b2025-08-20T02:06:47ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28402090-28592020-01-01202010.1155/2020/98392819839281Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI RegistryAlexandru Burlacu0Grigore Tinica1Bogdan Artene2Paul Simion3Diana Savuc4Adrian Covic5Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine, Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine, Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Iasi, RomaniaNephrology Clinic, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Center, “C.I. Parhon” University Hospital, Iasi, RomaniaBackground. Inappropriate cardiac catheterization lab activation together with false-positive angiographies and no-culprit found coronary interventions are now reported as costly to the medical system, influencing STEMI process efficiency. We aimed to analyze data from a high-volume interventional centre (>1000 primary PCIs/year) exploring etiologies and reporting characteristics from all “blank” coronary angiographies in STEMI. Methods. In this retrospective observational single-centre cohort study, we reported two-year data from a primary PCI registry (2035 patients). “Angio-only” cases were assigned to one of these categories: (a) Takotsubo syndrome; (b) coronary embolisation; (c) myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries; (d) myocarditis; (e) CABG-referred; (f) normal coronary arteries (mostly diagnostic errors); and (g)others (refusals and death prior angioplasty). Univariate analysis assessed correlations between each category and cardiovascular risk factors. Results. 412 STEMI patients received coronary angiography “only,” accounting for 20.2% of cath lab activations. Barely 77 patients had diagnostic errors (3.8% from all patients) implying false-activations. 40% of “angio-only” patients (n = 165) were referred to surgery due to severe atherosclerosis or mechanical complications. Patients with diagnostic errors and normal arteries displayed strong correlations with all cardiovascular risk factors. Probably, numerous risk factors “convinced” emergency department staff to call for an angio. Conclusions. STEMI network professionals often confront with coronary angiography “only” situations. We propose a classification according to etiologies. Next, STEMI guidelines should include audit recommendations and specific thresholds regarding “angio-only” patients, with specific focus on MINOCA, CABG referrals, and diagnostic errors. These measures will have a double impact: a better management of the patient, and a clearer perception about the usefulness of the investments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9839281
spellingShingle Alexandru Burlacu
Grigore Tinica
Bogdan Artene
Paul Simion
Diana Savuc
Adrian Covic
Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
Emergency Medicine International
title Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
title_full Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
title_fullStr Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
title_full_unstemmed Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
title_short Peculiarities and Consequences of Different Angiographic Patterns of STEMI Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography Only: Data from a Large Primary PCI Registry
title_sort peculiarities and consequences of different angiographic patterns of stemi patients receiving coronary angiography only data from a large primary pci registry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9839281
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandruburlacu peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry
AT grigoretinica peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry
AT bogdanartene peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry
AT paulsimion peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry
AT dianasavuc peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry
AT adriancovic peculiaritiesandconsequencesofdifferentangiographicpatternsofstemipatientsreceivingcoronaryangiographyonlydatafromalargeprimarypciregistry