A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis

Background: Many studies have compared the efficacy of Gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test [CBNAAT]) and line probe assay (LPA) techniques; however, a systematic and meticulous comparison of these two techniques is lacking. Objective: To study the accuracy of GeneXpert Mycoba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Upendra Kumar, D Dhanalakshmi, G. Sravan Kumar, V. Deepan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-07-01
Series:MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/mjhs.mjhs_122_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850082376140455936
author Upendra Kumar
D Dhanalakshmi
G. Sravan Kumar
V. Deepan
author_facet Upendra Kumar
D Dhanalakshmi
G. Sravan Kumar
V. Deepan
author_sort Upendra Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Many studies have compared the efficacy of Gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test [CBNAAT]) and line probe assay (LPA) techniques; however, a systematic and meticulous comparison of these two techniques is lacking. Objective: To study the accuracy of GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) assay and LPA in the detection of MTB complex in smear-positive retreatment cases of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Materials and Methods: This diagnostic evaluation study was conducted on 300 retreatment cases of pulmonary TB. The patients who were receiving retreatment were identified by sputum for acid fast Bacilli by Ziehl–Neelsen staining method and were instructed to provide sputum samples for CBNAAT and LPA. These sputum samples were then processed for liquid culture as part of the routine diagnostic procedure. Results: Majority of the patients (52.3%) were of 31–45 years of age. Males (56%) were more than females (44%). Most of the cases were relapse (88%). Ninety-three percent were reactive on sputum culture. Seventy percent had RIF resistance on CBNAAT. Isoniazid and RIF resistance was seen in 69.7% on LPA. 23.3% were sensitive on LPA and 7% had isoniazid resistance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive for CBNAAT as compared with LPA were 75%, 100%, 100%, and 22.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Both LPA and CBNAAT are equally effective in detecting MTB in the given sputum sample. However, LPA is preferred over can be very helpful as it can point out the Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF) resistant nature of the bacterium.
format Article
id doaj-art-706e51c4e1374e4eafda624061067ecf
institution DOAJ
issn 2321-7006
2321-7294
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
spelling doaj-art-706e51c4e1374e4eafda624061067ecf2025-08-20T02:44:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMRIMS Journal of Health Sciences2321-70062321-72942025-07-0113314415010.4103/mjhs.mjhs_122_23A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosisUpendra KumarD DhanalakshmiG. Sravan KumarV. DeepanBackground: Many studies have compared the efficacy of Gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test [CBNAAT]) and line probe assay (LPA) techniques; however, a systematic and meticulous comparison of these two techniques is lacking. Objective: To study the accuracy of GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) assay and LPA in the detection of MTB complex in smear-positive retreatment cases of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Materials and Methods: This diagnostic evaluation study was conducted on 300 retreatment cases of pulmonary TB. The patients who were receiving retreatment were identified by sputum for acid fast Bacilli by Ziehl–Neelsen staining method and were instructed to provide sputum samples for CBNAAT and LPA. These sputum samples were then processed for liquid culture as part of the routine diagnostic procedure. Results: Majority of the patients (52.3%) were of 31–45 years of age. Males (56%) were more than females (44%). Most of the cases were relapse (88%). Ninety-three percent were reactive on sputum culture. Seventy percent had RIF resistance on CBNAAT. Isoniazid and RIF resistance was seen in 69.7% on LPA. 23.3% were sensitive on LPA and 7% had isoniazid resistance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive for CBNAAT as compared with LPA were 75%, 100%, 100%, and 22.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Both LPA and CBNAAT are equally effective in detecting MTB in the given sputum sample. However, LPA is preferred over can be very helpful as it can point out the Isoniazid (INH) and Rifampicin (RIF) resistant nature of the bacterium.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/mjhs.mjhs_122_23cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification testisoniazidrifampicinsensitivityspecificitytuberculosis
spellingShingle Upendra Kumar
D Dhanalakshmi
G. Sravan Kumar
V. Deepan
A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences
cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test
isoniazid
rifampicin
sensitivity
specificity
tuberculosis
title A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_fullStr A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_short A comparative study of accuracy between gene Xpert (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test) and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis
title_sort comparative study of accuracy between gene xpert cartridge based nucleic acid amplification test and line probe assay in retreatment cases of sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis
topic cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test
isoniazid
rifampicin
sensitivity
specificity
tuberculosis
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/mjhs.mjhs_122_23
work_keys_str_mv AT upendrakumar acomparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT ddhanalakshmi acomparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT gsravankumar acomparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT vdeepan acomparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT upendrakumar comparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT ddhanalakshmi comparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT gsravankumar comparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis
AT vdeepan comparativestudyofaccuracybetweengenexpertcartridgebasednucleicacidamplificationtestandlineprobeassayinretreatmentcasesofsputumpositivepulmonarytuberculosis