Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa

Abstract Earth Observation (EO) technology continues to gain momentum for applications like crop monitoring and food security mapping across Africa. However, the development of these systems and the direction of the sector, even for locally relevant data sets, applications, and solutions, has been a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Nakalembe, Taryn Devereux, Alana Ginsburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Perspectives of Earth and Space Scientists
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CN000220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849726775536386048
author Catherine Nakalembe
Taryn Devereux
Alana Ginsburg
author_facet Catherine Nakalembe
Taryn Devereux
Alana Ginsburg
author_sort Catherine Nakalembe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Earth Observation (EO) technology continues to gain momentum for applications like crop monitoring and food security mapping across Africa. However, the development of these systems and the direction of the sector, even for locally relevant data sets, applications, and solutions, has been and remains largely externally driven. We utilized a database of ”leading organizations” in EO for Machine Learning” and partnerships in African space programs to investigate the landscape of EO for Agriculture in Africa. We analyze key actors based on origin, activities, funding sources, and other factors. Results reveal an imbalance where most African EO activities are directed by non‐African entities, highlighting data sovereignty issues and the need for enhanced local capacity building. Across the EO pipeline, African participation and leadership are limited despite national efforts to launch satellites and expand space programs. Analysis of a sample of organizations involved in the EO sector worldwide showed that 71% had active initiatives focused on the continent, despite only one organization being headquartered locally. Only around 1/3 of active satellites for African countries were contracted locally, and reports show that users face barriers to accessing their data. By mapping participation and funding flows, this research elucidates how African countries can exert greater control over EO data, build sustainable expertise, and harness EO technology to serve national development priorities. As the EO sector evolves rapidly, African voices must help shape the applications and priorities for these powerful technologies.
format Article
id doaj-art-705a2ed70dac4a1cbc1c32bafa98dd67
institution DOAJ
issn 2637-6989
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Perspectives of Earth and Space Scientists
spelling doaj-art-705a2ed70dac4a1cbc1c32bafa98dd672025-08-20T03:10:06ZengWileyPerspectives of Earth and Space Scientists2637-69892024-12-0151n/an/a10.1029/2023CN000220Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across AfricaCatherine Nakalembe0Taryn Devereux1Alana Ginsburg2University of Maryland College Park MD USAUniversity of Maryland College Park MD USAUniversity of Maryland College Park MD USAAbstract Earth Observation (EO) technology continues to gain momentum for applications like crop monitoring and food security mapping across Africa. However, the development of these systems and the direction of the sector, even for locally relevant data sets, applications, and solutions, has been and remains largely externally driven. We utilized a database of ”leading organizations” in EO for Machine Learning” and partnerships in African space programs to investigate the landscape of EO for Agriculture in Africa. We analyze key actors based on origin, activities, funding sources, and other factors. Results reveal an imbalance where most African EO activities are directed by non‐African entities, highlighting data sovereignty issues and the need for enhanced local capacity building. Across the EO pipeline, African participation and leadership are limited despite national efforts to launch satellites and expand space programs. Analysis of a sample of organizations involved in the EO sector worldwide showed that 71% had active initiatives focused on the continent, despite only one organization being headquartered locally. Only around 1/3 of active satellites for African countries were contracted locally, and reports show that users face barriers to accessing their data. By mapping participation and funding flows, this research elucidates how African countries can exert greater control over EO data, build sustainable expertise, and harness EO technology to serve national development priorities. As the EO sector evolves rapidly, African voices must help shape the applications and priorities for these powerful technologies.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CN000220
spellingShingle Catherine Nakalembe
Taryn Devereux
Alana Ginsburg
Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
Perspectives of Earth and Space Scientists
title Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
title_full Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
title_fullStr Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
title_full_unstemmed Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
title_short Whose Priorities? Examining Inequities in Earth Observation Advancements Across Africa
title_sort whose priorities examining inequities in earth observation advancements across africa
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023CN000220
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinenakalembe whoseprioritiesexamininginequitiesinearthobservationadvancementsacrossafrica
AT taryndevereux whoseprioritiesexamininginequitiesinearthobservationadvancementsacrossafrica
AT alanaginsburg whoseprioritiesexamininginequitiesinearthobservationadvancementsacrossafrica