APA (7th ed.) Citation

Yuan, C., Canton, G., & Hatsukami, T. S. Unfinished debate: Why IPH-based metrics are still needed—An Editorial for “Signal intensity and volume of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events: the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study”. Elsevier.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Yuan, Chun, Gador Canton, and Thomas S. Hatsukami. Unfinished Debate: Why IPH-based Metrics Are Still Needed—An Editorial for “Signal Intensity and Volume of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Risk of Ipsilateral Cerebrovascular Events: The Plaque At RISK (PARISK) Study”. Elsevier.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Yuan, Chun, et al. Unfinished Debate: Why IPH-based Metrics Are Still Needed—An Editorial for “Signal Intensity and Volume of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Risk of Ipsilateral Cerebrovascular Events: The Plaque At RISK (PARISK) Study”. Elsevier.