Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis

Introduction: In prostate cancer (PC), it is well established that the wider the anatomical template of dissection, the higher the number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved, and the higher the nodal yield, the better the detection of metastasis1,2. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorian Srok, Gordana Đorđević, Dean Markić, Josip Španjol, Kristian Krpina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sestre Milosrdnice University hospital, Institute of Clinical Medical Research 2024-01-01
Series:Acta Clinica Croatica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/467121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850166279389839360
author Dorian Srok
Gordana Đorđević
Dean Markić
Josip Španjol
Kristian Krpina
author_facet Dorian Srok
Gordana Đorđević
Dean Markić
Josip Španjol
Kristian Krpina
author_sort Dorian Srok
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In prostate cancer (PC), it is well established that the wider the anatomical template of dissection, the higher the number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved, and the higher the nodal yield, the better the detection of metastasis1,2. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate if the change in submission methodology (en bloc vs. separate) had an impact on the number of total LNs identified per patient and the number of positive LNs found, and to determine the impact of individual pathologists on the number of total LNs and positive LNs. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of hospital records of patients with PC in whom radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) was done in the period from November 2012 to December 2018. We used only a single-surgeon series in order to avoid performance bias in the lymphadenectomy template. Pathohistological examinations were performed by our hospital’s two dedicated urogenital pathologists. Patients were divided into high and intermediate risk groups according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, based on submission methodology of the lymphadenectomy tissue and by the pathologist performing the examinations. The number of LNs and number of positive LNs acquired were then compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Patients who underwent separate submission of lymphadenectomy tissue had a significantly higher nodal yield, but there was no difference in the number of positive LNs. There was no significant difference in the total number of LNs acquired and LN metastases detected between our two pathologists when comparing them by submission technique. Conclusions: Separate submission of lymphadenectomy tissue resulted in a higher nodal yield, but it did not translate to a higher number of positive LNs found.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ff4a351582348d2a7cde42daae2bcd2
institution OA Journals
issn 0353-9466
1333-9451
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University hospital, Institute of Clinical Medical Research
record_format Article
series Acta Clinica Croatica
spelling doaj-art-6ff4a351582348d2a7cde42daae2bcd22025-08-20T02:21:29ZengSestre Milosrdnice University hospital, Institute of Clinical Medical ResearchActa Clinica Croatica0353-94661333-94512024-01-0163.Supplement 2455010.20471/acc.2024.63.s2.7Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological AnalysisDorian Srok0Gordana Đorđević1Dean Markić2Josip Španjol3Kristian Krpina4Department of Urology, Clinical Hospital Center RijekaClinical department of pathology and cytology, Clinical hospital center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia; Department of general pathology and pathological anatomy, Faculty of medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, CroatiaDepartment of Urology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka; Department of urology, Faculty of medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, CroatiaDepartment of Urology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka; Department of urology, Faculty of medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, CroatiaDepartment of Urology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka; Department of urology, Faculty of medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, CroatiaIntroduction: In prostate cancer (PC), it is well established that the wider the anatomical template of dissection, the higher the number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved, and the higher the nodal yield, the better the detection of metastasis1,2. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate if the change in submission methodology (en bloc vs. separate) had an impact on the number of total LNs identified per patient and the number of positive LNs found, and to determine the impact of individual pathologists on the number of total LNs and positive LNs. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of hospital records of patients with PC in whom radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) was done in the period from November 2012 to December 2018. We used only a single-surgeon series in order to avoid performance bias in the lymphadenectomy template. Pathohistological examinations were performed by our hospital’s two dedicated urogenital pathologists. Patients were divided into high and intermediate risk groups according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, based on submission methodology of the lymphadenectomy tissue and by the pathologist performing the examinations. The number of LNs and number of positive LNs acquired were then compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Patients who underwent separate submission of lymphadenectomy tissue had a significantly higher nodal yield, but there was no difference in the number of positive LNs. There was no significant difference in the total number of LNs acquired and LN metastases detected between our two pathologists when comparing them by submission technique. Conclusions: Separate submission of lymphadenectomy tissue resulted in a higher nodal yield, but it did not translate to a higher number of positive LNs found.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/467121Prostate cancerLymphadenectomyNodal countSeparateEn Bloc
spellingShingle Dorian Srok
Gordana Đorđević
Dean Markić
Josip Španjol
Kristian Krpina
Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
Acta Clinica Croatica
Prostate cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Nodal count
Separate
En Bloc
title Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
title_full Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
title_fullStr Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
title_short Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Impact of Separate Vs. En Bloc Lymph Node Submission on Pathohistological Analysis
title_sort radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy impact of separate vs en bloc lymph node submission on pathohistological analysis
topic Prostate cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Nodal count
Separate
En Bloc
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/467121
work_keys_str_mv AT doriansrok radicalprostatectomywithextendedpelviclymphadenectomyimpactofseparatevsenbloclymphnodesubmissiononpathohistologicalanalysis
AT gordanađorđevic radicalprostatectomywithextendedpelviclymphadenectomyimpactofseparatevsenbloclymphnodesubmissiononpathohistologicalanalysis
AT deanmarkic radicalprostatectomywithextendedpelviclymphadenectomyimpactofseparatevsenbloclymphnodesubmissiononpathohistologicalanalysis
AT josipspanjol radicalprostatectomywithextendedpelviclymphadenectomyimpactofseparatevsenbloclymphnodesubmissiononpathohistologicalanalysis
AT kristiankrpina radicalprostatectomywithextendedpelviclymphadenectomyimpactofseparatevsenbloclymphnodesubmissiononpathohistologicalanalysis