Clinical trials with interim analyses: standardizing terminology to increase clarity
Abstract Interim analyses for group-sequential decision-making are prevalent in clinical trials. Methodology is well established and has been routinely implemented over the last decades. Still, confusions and uncertainties on aspects of how to operationalize and interpret interim analyses exist for...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Elina Asikanius, Benjamin Hofner, Lisa V. Hampson, Gernot Wassmer, Christopher Jennison, Tobias Mielke, Cornelia Ursula Kunz, Kaspar Rufibach |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Trials |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08942-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Troubling the Quest for Clarity
by: Ryan Thorneycroft
Published: (2025-06-01) -
From Catalyst to Clarity
by: Ezra Chan
Published: (2025-06-01) -
The standardization of bibliographical terminology: development and present situation
by: G. L. Levin, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A Qualitative Analysis of WHO’s International Standard Terminologies on TCM
by: Han LAI, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Correlation of Formal Clarity and Rule of Law
by: E. E. Silantieva
Published: (2021-03-01)