Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB
Purpose: To review the clinical features, causes of injury, types of foreign bodies, results of vitrectomy and prognostic factors in patients with posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB). Methods: Study design: Retrospective review of clinical records. Study participants: 108 consecutive...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2010-10-01
|
| Series: | Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/0972-0200.377303 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850042611761414144 |
|---|---|
| author | Harsha Bhattacharjee Satyen Deka Manab Jyoti Barman Ronel Soibam Sumita S Barthakur Lokesh Jain |
| author_facet | Harsha Bhattacharjee Satyen Deka Manab Jyoti Barman Ronel Soibam Sumita S Barthakur Lokesh Jain |
| author_sort | Harsha Bhattacharjee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose:
To review the clinical features, causes of injury, types of foreign bodies, results of vitrectomy and prognostic factors in patients with posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB).
Methods:
Study design: Retrospective review of clinical records. Study participants: 108 consecutive patients with posterior segment IOFB presenting at the study hospital between 1994 and 2007; and treated with IOFB removal by intraocular forceps or electromagnet or combination of the two following vitrectomy. Outcome measures: Clinical presentations, investigations, surgical techniques, final anatomical and visual status and duration of follow up. Statistical analysis: Chi-squared test.
Results:
The commonest presenting feature was uniocular visual loss. Work place injuries while chiseling and hammering (67.5%, n=73) without protective eyewear were the commonest. Metallic IOFBs were significantly common at 77.16% (n=98). IOFBs were removed using intraocular magnet (74%, n=80), intraocular forceps (18.5%, n=20) or a combination of the two (7.4%, n=8). Final visual acuity of ≥20/120 was achieved in 32.4% (n=35) cases. Presence of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) (p<0.001), posterior segment haemorrhage (p<0.001) and Retinal Detachment (RD) (p=0.045) at presentation implied bad prognosis.
Conclusions:
IOFBs were mostly occupational and preventable. Cases presenting with RAPD, posterior segment haemorrhage and RD had bad visual prognosis. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6fab442448fb40e1a9bcb61c8d47afde |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0972-0200 2454-2784 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2010-10-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology |
| spelling | doaj-art-6fab442448fb40e1a9bcb61c8d47afde2025-08-20T02:55:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDelhi Journal of Ophthalmology0972-02002454-27842010-10-01213424710.4103/0972-0200.377303Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFBHarsha BhattacharjeeSatyen DekaManab Jyoti BarmanRonel SoibamSumita S BarthakurLokesh JainPurpose: To review the clinical features, causes of injury, types of foreign bodies, results of vitrectomy and prognostic factors in patients with posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB). Methods: Study design: Retrospective review of clinical records. Study participants: 108 consecutive patients with posterior segment IOFB presenting at the study hospital between 1994 and 2007; and treated with IOFB removal by intraocular forceps or electromagnet or combination of the two following vitrectomy. Outcome measures: Clinical presentations, investigations, surgical techniques, final anatomical and visual status and duration of follow up. Statistical analysis: Chi-squared test. Results: The commonest presenting feature was uniocular visual loss. Work place injuries while chiseling and hammering (67.5%, n=73) without protective eyewear were the commonest. Metallic IOFBs were significantly common at 77.16% (n=98). IOFBs were removed using intraocular magnet (74%, n=80), intraocular forceps (18.5%, n=20) or a combination of the two (7.4%, n=8). Final visual acuity of ≥20/120 was achieved in 32.4% (n=35) cases. Presence of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) (p<0.001), posterior segment haemorrhage (p<0.001) and Retinal Detachment (RD) (p=0.045) at presentation implied bad prognosis. Conclusions: IOFBs were mostly occupational and preventable. Cases presenting with RAPD, posterior segment haemorrhage and RD had bad visual prognosis.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/0972-0200.377303 |
| spellingShingle | Harsha Bhattacharjee Satyen Deka Manab Jyoti Barman Ronel Soibam Sumita S Barthakur Lokesh Jain Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology |
| title | Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB |
| title_full | Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB |
| title_fullStr | Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB |
| title_short | Clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment IOFB |
| title_sort | clinical presentation and outcomes following posterior segment iofb |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/0972-0200.377303 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT harshabhattacharjee clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb AT satyendeka clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb AT manabjyotibarman clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb AT ronelsoibam clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb AT sumitasbarthakur clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb AT lokeshjain clinicalpresentationandoutcomesfollowingposteriorsegmentiofb |