Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis

Introduction An important consideration in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is whether the addition of methotrexate (MTX) to biologics has greater efficacy than biologic monotherapy with respect to efficacy outcomes in these patients.Objectives To conduct a network meta-analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip J Mease, Daniel E Furst, Jeffrey R Lisse, Christophe Sapin, Kirstin Griffing, Sarah Ross, Paulo Reis, Aisha Vadhariya, Soumya Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-02-01
Series:RMD Open
Online Access:https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003423.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850198592560562176
author Philip J Mease
Daniel E Furst
Jeffrey R Lisse
Christophe Sapin
Kirstin Griffing
Sarah Ross
Paulo Reis
Aisha Vadhariya
Soumya Reddy
author_facet Philip J Mease
Daniel E Furst
Jeffrey R Lisse
Christophe Sapin
Kirstin Griffing
Sarah Ross
Paulo Reis
Aisha Vadhariya
Soumya Reddy
author_sort Philip J Mease
collection DOAJ
description Introduction An important consideration in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is whether the addition of methotrexate (MTX) to biologics has greater efficacy than biologic monotherapy with respect to efficacy outcomes in these patients.Objectives To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing biologics by treatment class with and without MTX for treatment of adults with active PsA.Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) identified randomised, double-blinded, controlled trials, and a Bayesian NMA compared biologics with and without MTX by treatment class (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) and IL-17i). Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50% and 70% (ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70) improvement response.Results The SLR initially identified 31 studies, of which 17 met feasibility criteria for the NMA by containing the ‘without MTX’ subgroup. For ACR20 efficacy (the most robust assessment examined), all active treatments were significantly better than placebo. No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between biologic monotherapy (for all classes examined) and biologics in combination with MTX for ACR20/50. IL-17i were comparable to IL-23i, and IL-17i were significantly better than TNFi for ACR20. Although limited by fewer trials, TNFi, IL-23i and IL-17i were not statistically different for ACR50/70.Conclusions Concomitant use of MTX and biologics did not improve ACR efficacy outcomes versus biologic monotherapy. MTX does not appear to be necessary as a background therapy when biologics are used for the achievement of ACR20/50 responses in patients with PsA.
format Article
id doaj-art-6faa857d6ef441bdb3a0886d6b37c265
institution OA Journals
issn 2056-5933
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series RMD Open
spelling doaj-art-6faa857d6ef441bdb3a0886d6b37c2652025-08-20T02:12:50ZengBMJ Publishing GroupRMD Open2056-59332024-02-0110110.1136/rmdopen-2023-003423Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysisPhilip J Mease0Daniel E Furst1Jeffrey R Lisse2Christophe Sapin3Kirstin Griffing4Sarah Ross5Paulo Reis6Aisha Vadhariya7Soumya Reddy8University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA6 Division of Rheumatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USAEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USADivision of Rheumatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USAIntroduction An important consideration in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is whether the addition of methotrexate (MTX) to biologics has greater efficacy than biologic monotherapy with respect to efficacy outcomes in these patients.Objectives To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing biologics by treatment class with and without MTX for treatment of adults with active PsA.Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) identified randomised, double-blinded, controlled trials, and a Bayesian NMA compared biologics with and without MTX by treatment class (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i) and IL-17i). Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50% and 70% (ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70) improvement response.Results The SLR initially identified 31 studies, of which 17 met feasibility criteria for the NMA by containing the ‘without MTX’ subgroup. For ACR20 efficacy (the most robust assessment examined), all active treatments were significantly better than placebo. No statistically significant differences were demonstrated between biologic monotherapy (for all classes examined) and biologics in combination with MTX for ACR20/50. IL-17i were comparable to IL-23i, and IL-17i were significantly better than TNFi for ACR20. Although limited by fewer trials, TNFi, IL-23i and IL-17i were not statistically different for ACR50/70.Conclusions Concomitant use of MTX and biologics did not improve ACR efficacy outcomes versus biologic monotherapy. MTX does not appear to be necessary as a background therapy when biologics are used for the achievement of ACR20/50 responses in patients with PsA.https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003423.full
spellingShingle Philip J Mease
Daniel E Furst
Jeffrey R Lisse
Christophe Sapin
Kirstin Griffing
Sarah Ross
Paulo Reis
Aisha Vadhariya
Soumya Reddy
Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
RMD Open
title Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
title_full Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
title_short Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis
title_sort evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis a network meta analysis
url https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003423.full
work_keys_str_mv AT philipjmease evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT danielefurst evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT jeffreyrlisse evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT christophesapin evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT kirstingriffing evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sarahross evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT pauloreis evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT aishavadhariya evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT soumyareddy evaluatingtheefficacyofbiologicswithandwithoutmethotrexateinthetreatmentofpsoriaticarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis