Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective

In its review of the Federal civil justice system, the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended that, “in order to enhance appreciation of ethical standards and professional responsibility, law students should be encouraged and provided opportunity to undertake pro bono work as part of their aca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lutz-Christian Wolff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2003-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687012237377536
author Lutz-Christian Wolff
author_facet Lutz-Christian Wolff
author_sort Lutz-Christian Wolff
collection DOAJ
description In its review of the Federal civil justice system, the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended that, “in order to enhance appreciation of ethical standards and professional responsibility, law students should be encouraged and provided opportunity to undertake pro bono work as part of their academic or practical legal training requirements.” This recommendation was endorsed by the National Pro Bono Task Force in its report delivered to the Federal Attorney General in June 2001. To achieve this goal, the Task Force recommended that all law students should be provided with: • opportunities for internships/outreach programs with a pro bono focus; • opportunities to undertake clinical experience; • clinical components within the academic curriculum; • stand-alone electives such as “Public Interest Advocacy”; and • opportunities for reflection upon and critical analysis of ethical matters (including pro bono) in the classroom.
format Article
id doaj-art-6f77db4ce4ae46de83b8a27dcbdb4b06
institution DOAJ
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
publishDate 2003-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj-art-6f77db4ce4ae46de83b8a27dcbdb4b062025-08-20T03:22:29ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132003-01-0114110.53300/001c.6159Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative PerspectiveLutz-Christian WolffIn its review of the Federal civil justice system, the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended that, “in order to enhance appreciation of ethical standards and professional responsibility, law students should be encouraged and provided opportunity to undertake pro bono work as part of their academic or practical legal training requirements.” This recommendation was endorsed by the National Pro Bono Task Force in its report delivered to the Federal Attorney General in June 2001. To achieve this goal, the Task Force recommended that all law students should be provided with: • opportunities for internships/outreach programs with a pro bono focus; • opportunities to undertake clinical experience; • clinical components within the academic curriculum; • stand-alone electives such as “Public Interest Advocacy”; and • opportunities for reflection upon and critical analysis of ethical matters (including pro bono) in the classroom.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6159
spellingShingle Lutz-Christian Wolff
Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
Legal Education Review
title Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
title_full Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
title_fullStr Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
title_short Structured Problem Solving: German Methodology from a Comparative Perspective
title_sort structured problem solving german methodology from a comparative perspective
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6159
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzchristianwolff structuredproblemsolvinggermanmethodologyfromacomparativeperspective