Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach

Within the framework of our research we intend to show how online reviews could be seen not only as texts, but as digital practices and as part of “communal formations”. In order to justify our claim, we have collected extensive data from different literary review resources as well as reviews of mus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Moskvina, Kristina Petzold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Cultural Analytics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.138350
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850232997820760064
author Anna Moskvina
Kristina Petzold
author_facet Anna Moskvina
Kristina Petzold
author_sort Anna Moskvina
collection DOAJ
description Within the framework of our research we intend to show how online reviews could be seen not only as texts, but as digital practices and as part of “communal formations”. In order to justify our claim, we have collected extensive data from different literary review resources as well as reviews of museums and exhibitions, and general discussions of cultural objects from different reviewing platforms. Implementing traditional methods of corpus linguistics, we analyzed the digital review processes by comparing average review and sentence length, normalized distribution of parts of speech and subordinate clauses, and the use of keywords and phrases. As a result, we established that online reviewing is based on platform specific patterns and can be described as a form of “communal formation” that consist of shared knowledge and shared practices.
format Article
id doaj-art-6f52aeea44334efcabeccf1904cc0d43
institution OA Journals
issn 2371-4549
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill University
record_format Article
series Journal of Cultural Analytics
spelling doaj-art-6f52aeea44334efcabeccf1904cc0d432025-08-20T02:03:01ZengDepartment of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures at McGill UniversityJournal of Cultural Analytics2371-45492025-06-017210.22148/001c.138350Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic ApproachAnna MoskvinaKristina PetzoldWithin the framework of our research we intend to show how online reviews could be seen not only as texts, but as digital practices and as part of “communal formations”. In order to justify our claim, we have collected extensive data from different literary review resources as well as reviews of museums and exhibitions, and general discussions of cultural objects from different reviewing platforms. Implementing traditional methods of corpus linguistics, we analyzed the digital review processes by comparing average review and sentence length, normalized distribution of parts of speech and subordinate clauses, and the use of keywords and phrases. As a result, we established that online reviewing is based on platform specific patterns and can be described as a form of “communal formation” that consist of shared knowledge and shared practices.https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.138350
spellingShingle Anna Moskvina
Kristina Petzold
Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
Journal of Cultural Analytics
title Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
title_full Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
title_fullStr Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
title_short Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach
title_sort online reviews as communal formations a corpus linguistic approach
url https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.138350
work_keys_str_mv AT annamoskvina onlinereviewsascommunalformationsacorpuslinguisticapproach
AT kristinapetzold onlinereviewsascommunalformationsacorpuslinguisticapproach