Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Objective</h4>To summarize the existing evidence from double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding the effects of biologic agents for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis (LVV).<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siyuan Chen, Xiao Cui, Yue Chen, Xiaogang Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314566
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849328057095028736
author Siyuan Chen
Xiao Cui
Yue Chen
Xiaogang Guo
author_facet Siyuan Chen
Xiao Cui
Yue Chen
Xiaogang Guo
author_sort Siyuan Chen
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To summarize the existing evidence from double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding the effects of biologic agents for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis (LVV).<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov covering the period from database inception to May 3rd, 2023. Double-blind RCTs and cohort studies reporting biologic therapies' effects on LVV including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) with outcomes of interest in English were included. The primary outcome of interest was relapse rates during glucocorticoid tapering. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool were used for the quality assessment. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 4599 references retrieved, 10 RCTs regarding GCA, 6 cohort studies, and 2 RCTs regarding TAK were included, comprising 997 participants in total. All the included RCTs were of low risk of bias, while the 6 cohort studies were of moderate to serious risk of bias. Meta-analysis suggested a significant superiority of biologic agents in prolonging relapse-free survival, increasing glucocorticoid taper rate, and decreasing cumulative glucocorticoids dose for both GCA and TAK. Additionally, GCA patients using biologic agents had significantly lower relapse rates and ESR levels with higher remission rates. Trends of favoring biologic agents in reducing relapse rate, ITAS-2010, ITAS-A, ESR, and CRP along with increased remission rate for TAK were also observed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Biologic agents significantly improved clinical outcomes in LVV by reducing relapse rates, enhancing remission, and enabling safer glucocorticoid tapering, offering an important therapeutic advantage for managing both GCA and TAK. Further well-designed studies and corresponding meta-analyses are needed to validate their long-term efficacy and safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-6f4c423612a84fa6b8a570e1734cdb89
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-6f4c423612a84fa6b8a570e1734cdb892025-08-20T03:47:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e031456610.1371/journal.pone.0314566Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Siyuan ChenXiao CuiYue ChenXiaogang Guo<h4>Objective</h4>To summarize the existing evidence from double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding the effects of biologic agents for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis (LVV).<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov covering the period from database inception to May 3rd, 2023. Double-blind RCTs and cohort studies reporting biologic therapies' effects on LVV including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) with outcomes of interest in English were included. The primary outcome of interest was relapse rates during glucocorticoid tapering. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool were used for the quality assessment. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 4599 references retrieved, 10 RCTs regarding GCA, 6 cohort studies, and 2 RCTs regarding TAK were included, comprising 997 participants in total. All the included RCTs were of low risk of bias, while the 6 cohort studies were of moderate to serious risk of bias. Meta-analysis suggested a significant superiority of biologic agents in prolonging relapse-free survival, increasing glucocorticoid taper rate, and decreasing cumulative glucocorticoids dose for both GCA and TAK. Additionally, GCA patients using biologic agents had significantly lower relapse rates and ESR levels with higher remission rates. Trends of favoring biologic agents in reducing relapse rate, ITAS-2010, ITAS-A, ESR, and CRP along with increased remission rate for TAK were also observed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Biologic agents significantly improved clinical outcomes in LVV by reducing relapse rates, enhancing remission, and enabling safer glucocorticoid tapering, offering an important therapeutic advantage for managing both GCA and TAK. Further well-designed studies and corresponding meta-analyses are needed to validate their long-term efficacy and safety.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314566
spellingShingle Siyuan Chen
Xiao Cui
Yue Chen
Xiaogang Guo
Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort biologic therapies for the treatment of large vessel vasculitis a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314566
work_keys_str_mv AT siyuanchen biologictherapiesforthetreatmentoflargevesselvasculitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaocui biologictherapiesforthetreatmentoflargevesselvasculitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuechen biologictherapiesforthetreatmentoflargevesselvasculitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaogangguo biologictherapiesforthetreatmentoflargevesselvasculitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis