The Boundaries of the Unconscious
The psyché-soma difference (Bartoš 2006) is one of the structuring themes not only of Western thought but also of modern psychology, which inherits this debate from the philosophical tradition and the religious tradition. Through a journey with early texts by Henri Bergson, including the psychology...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
UNICApress
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Critical Hermeneutics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/ecch/article/view/6167 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850179865383272448 |
|---|---|
| author | Rodrigo Barros Gewehr |
| author_facet | Rodrigo Barros Gewehr |
| author_sort | Rodrigo Barros Gewehr |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The psyché-soma difference (Bartoš 2006) is one of the structuring themes not only of Western thought but also of modern psychology, which inherits this debate from the philosophical tradition and the religious tradition. Through a journey with early texts by Henri Bergson, including the psychology and metaphysics classes he taught at the Lycée de Clermont-Ferrand in 1887-1888, as well as the psychophysical parallelism of 1901, we address the difficulties pointed out in the monist position and its reverberations in contemporary psychology, which are commanded by neuroscience and cognitive psychology. We intend to highlight the impasses of the monist position that continue to be re-edited. In fact, despite countless technological advances concerning the issue of the nature of this duality, the debates seem to have stopped at the assertions that Bergson already denounced at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, which denotes the strong presence of ontological options that largely overlap with the empirical inspiration of modern science. What are the determining lines in the resistance to this debate? Why do advances in research technologies not correspond to advances in the argument about this duality? Are there practical consequences for the reading of reality when adopting the monist principle, which remains sovereign in Western thought albeit unproven? These questions will guide the reflection we begin in this work.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6f2c5eb4ceb043b49604b2c70623bb25 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2533-1825 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | UNICApress |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Critical Hermeneutics |
| spelling | doaj-art-6f2c5eb4ceb043b49604b2c70623bb252025-08-20T02:18:24ZengUNICApressCritical Hermeneutics2533-18252024-11-018210.13125/CH/6167The Boundaries of the UnconsciousRodrigo Barros Gewehr The psyché-soma difference (Bartoš 2006) is one of the structuring themes not only of Western thought but also of modern psychology, which inherits this debate from the philosophical tradition and the religious tradition. Through a journey with early texts by Henri Bergson, including the psychology and metaphysics classes he taught at the Lycée de Clermont-Ferrand in 1887-1888, as well as the psychophysical parallelism of 1901, we address the difficulties pointed out in the monist position and its reverberations in contemporary psychology, which are commanded by neuroscience and cognitive psychology. We intend to highlight the impasses of the monist position that continue to be re-edited. In fact, despite countless technological advances concerning the issue of the nature of this duality, the debates seem to have stopped at the assertions that Bergson already denounced at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, which denotes the strong presence of ontological options that largely overlap with the empirical inspiration of modern science. What are the determining lines in the resistance to this debate? Why do advances in research technologies not correspond to advances in the argument about this duality? Are there practical consequences for the reading of reality when adopting the monist principle, which remains sovereign in Western thought albeit unproven? These questions will guide the reflection we begin in this work. https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/ecch/article/view/6167materialist monismdualismpsyché-somaunconsciousBergson |
| spellingShingle | Rodrigo Barros Gewehr The Boundaries of the Unconscious Critical Hermeneutics materialist monism dualism psyché-soma unconscious Bergson |
| title | The Boundaries of the Unconscious |
| title_full | The Boundaries of the Unconscious |
| title_fullStr | The Boundaries of the Unconscious |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Boundaries of the Unconscious |
| title_short | The Boundaries of the Unconscious |
| title_sort | boundaries of the unconscious |
| topic | materialist monism dualism psyché-soma unconscious Bergson |
| url | https://ojs.unica.it/index.php/ecch/article/view/6167 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodrigobarrosgewehr theboundariesoftheunconscious AT rodrigobarrosgewehr boundariesoftheunconscious |