Probabilistic Forecasting of Ground Magnetic Perturbation Spikes at Mid‐Latitude Stations

Abstract The prediction of large fluctuations in the ground magnetic field (dB/dt) is essential for preventing damage from Geomagnetically Induced Currents. Directly forecasting these fluctuations has proven difficult, but accurately determining the risk of extreme events can allow for the worst of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Coughlan, Amy Keesee, Victor Pinto, Raman Mukundan, José Paulo Marchezi, Jeremiah Johnson, Hyunju Connor, Don Hampton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-06-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003446
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract The prediction of large fluctuations in the ground magnetic field (dB/dt) is essential for preventing damage from Geomagnetically Induced Currents. Directly forecasting these fluctuations has proven difficult, but accurately determining the risk of extreme events can allow for the worst of the damage to be prevented. Here we trained Convolutional Neural Network models for eight mid‐latitude magnetometers to predict the probability that dB/dt will exceed the 99th percentile threshold 30–60 min in the future. Two model frameworks were compared, a model trained using solar wind data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite, and another model trained on both ACE and SuperMAG ground magnetometer data. The models were compared to examine if the addition of current ground magnetometer data significantly improved the forecasts of dB/dt in the future prediction window. A bootstrapping method was employed using a random split of the training and validation data to provide a measure of uncertainty in model predictions. The models were evaluated on the ground truth data during eight geomagnetic storms and a suite of evaluation metrics are presented. The models were also compared to a persistence model to ensure that the model using both datasets did not over‐rely on dB/dt values in making its predictions. Overall, we find that the models using both the solar wind and ground magnetometer data had better metric scores than the solar wind only and persistence models, and was able to capture more spatially localized variations in the dB/dt threshold crossings.
ISSN:1542-7390