A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation
Objectives: To compare the clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimation at term gestation. Methods: This prospective observational study included 500 antenatal women with singleton pregnancy with gestational age (GA) between 37-41 completed weeks delivering within 24 hours of admission and in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | New Indian Journal of OBGYN |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/10349.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849726599751008256 |
|---|---|
| author | Rashmi Khatri Geetika Bhardwaj Seema Rawal Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Neeru Malik |
| author_facet | Rashmi Khatri Geetika Bhardwaj Seema Rawal Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Neeru Malik |
| author_sort | Rashmi Khatri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives: To compare the clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimation at term gestation. Methods: This
prospective observational study included 500 antenatal women with singleton pregnancy with gestational age (GA)
between 37-41 completed weeks delivering within 24 hours of admission and in labor or booked for elective
caesarean section. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was determined by three clinical methods (Leopold Manoeuvre,
Johnson’s formula, and Dare’s formula) and ultrasound estimation (Hadlock’s formula). The calculated weight (by all
methods) was considered accurate if they were within ±10% of actual birth weight (ABW). All the measurements
were tabulated in a datasheet and compared with ABW after delivery of fetus. P-value <0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Results: Absolute mean error in prediction of actual fetal weight was significantly different
among different methods with highest mean error being with Johnson’s method (359.37±97.09) and lowest error
being with Leopold’s method (212.65±69.99), with ultrasound (233±65.86) showing the value in between both of
them with p-value <0.0001. For predicting actual birth weight within the range of 10% in total study subjects,
ultrasound showed the best closest estimate with 90.8% cases followed by Leopold’s method with 87.80% cases,
Johnson method (80.00%) and Dare’s method (79.00%) (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Clinical methods and USG are
accurate in prediction of the ABW. Among clinical methods, Leopold’s maneuver was most accurate and comparable
to USG. The accuracy of clinical method in comparison to sonographic method for prediction of actual birth weight
may allow for its use in low resource settings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6e77f8c91968488b9daf3799c1e2921f |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2454-2334 2454-2342 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | New Indian Journal of OBGYN |
| spelling | doaj-art-6e77f8c91968488b9daf3799c1e2921f2025-08-20T03:10:07ZengBarpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological SocietyNew Indian Journal of OBGYN2454-23342454-23422024-05-0110234935610.21276/obgyn.2024.10.2.20A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestationRashmi Khatri0Geetika Bhardwaj1Seema Rawal2Rajiv Ranjan Kumar3 Neeru Malik4Associate Professor, Department of OBG, Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar (BSA) Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaResident,Department of OBG, Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar (BSA) Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaAssociate Professor, Department of OBG, Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar (BSA) Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, India Associate Professor, Department of OBG, Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar (BSA) Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaAssociate Professor, Department of OBG, Dr. Baba Sahib Ambedkar (BSA) Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaObjectives: To compare the clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimation at term gestation. Methods: This prospective observational study included 500 antenatal women with singleton pregnancy with gestational age (GA) between 37-41 completed weeks delivering within 24 hours of admission and in labor or booked for elective caesarean section. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was determined by three clinical methods (Leopold Manoeuvre, Johnson’s formula, and Dare’s formula) and ultrasound estimation (Hadlock’s formula). The calculated weight (by all methods) was considered accurate if they were within ±10% of actual birth weight (ABW). All the measurements were tabulated in a datasheet and compared with ABW after delivery of fetus. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Absolute mean error in prediction of actual fetal weight was significantly different among different methods with highest mean error being with Johnson’s method (359.37±97.09) and lowest error being with Leopold’s method (212.65±69.99), with ultrasound (233±65.86) showing the value in between both of them with p-value <0.0001. For predicting actual birth weight within the range of 10% in total study subjects, ultrasound showed the best closest estimate with 90.8% cases followed by Leopold’s method with 87.80% cases, Johnson method (80.00%) and Dare’s method (79.00%) (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Clinical methods and USG are accurate in prediction of the ABW. Among clinical methods, Leopold’s maneuver was most accurate and comparable to USG. The accuracy of clinical method in comparison to sonographic method for prediction of actual birth weight may allow for its use in low resource settings.https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/10349.pdfactual birth weightclinical fetal weight estimationdare’s formulahadlock equationjohnsons formulaultrasonography |
| spellingShingle | Rashmi Khatri Geetika Bhardwaj Seema Rawal Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Neeru Malik A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation New Indian Journal of OBGYN actual birth weight clinical fetal weight estimation dare’s formula hadlock equation johnsons formula ultrasonography |
| title | A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| title_full | A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| title_fullStr | A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| title_short | A comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| title_sort | comparative study of clinical methods and ultrasound methods for prediction of fetal birth weight at term gestation |
| topic | actual birth weight clinical fetal weight estimation dare’s formula hadlock equation johnsons formula ultrasonography |
| url | https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/10349.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rashmikhatri acomparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT geetikabhardwaj acomparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT seemarawal acomparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT rajivranjankumar acomparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT neerumalik acomparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT rashmikhatri comparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT geetikabhardwaj comparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT seemarawal comparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT rajivranjankumar comparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation AT neerumalik comparativestudyofclinicalmethodsandultrasoundmethodsforpredictionoffetalbirthweightattermgestation |