Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations
Under a linguistic categorization hypothesis causal connectives are taken as categorization devices. Indeed, corpus studies suggest that connectives strongly specialize in one specific causality category, but also that their use is not restricted to the causality categories they are prototypically a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/7260 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832581851929116672 |
|---|---|
| author | Ninke Stukker Ted Sanders |
| author_facet | Ninke Stukker Ted Sanders |
| author_sort | Ninke Stukker |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Under a linguistic categorization hypothesis causal connectives are taken as categorization devices. Indeed, corpus studies suggest that connectives strongly specialize in one specific causality category, but also that their use is not restricted to the causality categories they are prototypically associated with. If we assume that the meaning of causal connectives can adequately be described with reference to well-defined conceptual categories – how can we explain that variation in the actual usage of connectives occurs? We focus on volitional causal coherence relations, which count as the prototypical usage context of the Dutch causal connective daarom “that’s why”. Volitional causal relations can alternatively be marked with the connective dus “so” which is prototypically used in epistemic causal relations. Our hypothesis is that volitional causal relations marked with daarom vs. dus systematically differ in terms of subjectivity. We discuss a model of analysis that contains multiple operationalizations of subjectivity and distinguishes between different levels of complexity (sub-clause, clause, and discourse). We find that volitional causal relations with dus contain subjective elements more often than volitional causal relations with daarom. We interpret this patterning within a usage-based theoretical framework, and propose to analyze cases of volitional dus as non-prototypical instantiations of dus’s inherent subjective, prototypically epistemic meaning. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6e5ebbf8fdb74418b08ae19fd12c52d2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1963-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Caen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discours |
| spelling | doaj-art-6e5ebbf8fdb74418b08ae19fd12c52d22025-01-30T09:52:53ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232017-10-01410.4000/discours.7260Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relationsNinke StukkerTed SandersUnder a linguistic categorization hypothesis causal connectives are taken as categorization devices. Indeed, corpus studies suggest that connectives strongly specialize in one specific causality category, but also that their use is not restricted to the causality categories they are prototypically associated with. If we assume that the meaning of causal connectives can adequately be described with reference to well-defined conceptual categories – how can we explain that variation in the actual usage of connectives occurs? We focus on volitional causal coherence relations, which count as the prototypical usage context of the Dutch causal connective daarom “that’s why”. Volitional causal relations can alternatively be marked with the connective dus “so” which is prototypically used in epistemic causal relations. Our hypothesis is that volitional causal relations marked with daarom vs. dus systematically differ in terms of subjectivity. We discuss a model of analysis that contains multiple operationalizations of subjectivity and distinguishes between different levels of complexity (sub-clause, clause, and discourse). We find that volitional causal relations with dus contain subjective elements more often than volitional causal relations with daarom. We interpret this patterning within a usage-based theoretical framework, and propose to analyze cases of volitional dus as non-prototypical instantiations of dus’s inherent subjective, prototypically epistemic meaning.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/7260causal connectivesvolitional causalityepistemic causalitysubjectivityperspectivizationcorpus studies |
| spellingShingle | Ninke Stukker Ted Sanders Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations Discours causal connectives volitional causality epistemic causality subjectivity perspectivization corpus studies |
| title | Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| title_full | Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| title_fullStr | Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| title_short | Another(’s) perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives: a usage-based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| title_sort | another s perspective on subjectivity in causal connectives a usage based analysis of volitional causal relations |
| topic | causal connectives volitional causality epistemic causality subjectivity perspectivization corpus studies |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/discours/7260 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ninkestukker anothersperspectiveonsubjectivityincausalconnectivesausagebasedanalysisofvolitionalcausalrelations AT tedsanders anothersperspectiveonsubjectivityincausalconnectivesausagebasedanalysisofvolitionalcausalrelations |