Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata

Abstract In bioturbated strata, defining and obtaining a representative elementary volume for permeability measurements presents significant challenges. To address this, spot permeability is often used as an alternative method to estimate the bulk permeability of these complex strata. However, labor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayman Al-Lehyani, Hassan A. Eltom, Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, Eassa Abdullah, Ammar El-Husseiny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00697-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190735907749888
author Ayman Al-Lehyani
Hassan A. Eltom
Abdullatif Al-Shuhail
Eassa Abdullah
Ammar El-Husseiny
author_facet Ayman Al-Lehyani
Hassan A. Eltom
Abdullatif Al-Shuhail
Eassa Abdullah
Ammar El-Husseiny
author_sort Ayman Al-Lehyani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In bioturbated strata, defining and obtaining a representative elementary volume for permeability measurements presents significant challenges. To address this, spot permeability is often used as an alternative method to estimate the bulk permeability of these complex strata. However, laboratory measurements of spot permeability require steady-state nitrogen gas injection and careful sample preparation including slab cutting which makes the process both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Alternatively, field measurements using portable devices offer a more cost-effective, straightforward, and real-time approach for assessing permeability in situ. To evaluate the accuracy of portable devices in measuring spot permeability in bioturbated strata, we compare and contrast permeability measurements on the same rock samples (from the Hanifa Formation in central Saudi Arabia) using two different techniques: the sophisticated laboratory-based AutoScan system and the portable TinyPerm 3 field device both from New England Research (NER). Two sets of permeability data comprising 64 measurements were obtained and analyzed graphically using Whisker Box Plots, Bland-Altman Plot, Curve Matching, and Cross Plots, as well as statistically through correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The graphical analysis revealed no substantial difference in permeability measured by the two methods, a finding further supported by ANOVA results, which indicated no statistically significant difference (P-value > 0.05). Additionally, the correlation plot between the permeability measurements from the two methods yielded a straight line with an R $$^2$$ value greater than 0.9, demonstrating a strong agreement. This study highlights the potential of using portable handheld permeameters to measure spot permeability of bioturbated strata in the field, offering a cost-effective, accurate, and real-time alternative to laboratory-based techniques in estimating their bulk permeability.
format Article
id doaj-art-6dbf70f8586e4d1eb045dabf20602076
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-6dbf70f8586e4d1eb045dabf206020762025-08-20T02:15:11ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-05-0115111310.1038/s41598-025-00697-wComparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strataAyman Al-Lehyani0Hassan A. Eltom1Abdullatif Al-Shuhail2Eassa Abdullah3Ammar El-Husseiny4Geosciences Department, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & MineralsGeosciences Department, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & MineralsGeosciences Department, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & MineralsCenter for Integrative Petroleum Research, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & MineralsGeosciences Department, College of Petroleum Engineering Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & MineralsAbstract In bioturbated strata, defining and obtaining a representative elementary volume for permeability measurements presents significant challenges. To address this, spot permeability is often used as an alternative method to estimate the bulk permeability of these complex strata. However, laboratory measurements of spot permeability require steady-state nitrogen gas injection and careful sample preparation including slab cutting which makes the process both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Alternatively, field measurements using portable devices offer a more cost-effective, straightforward, and real-time approach for assessing permeability in situ. To evaluate the accuracy of portable devices in measuring spot permeability in bioturbated strata, we compare and contrast permeability measurements on the same rock samples (from the Hanifa Formation in central Saudi Arabia) using two different techniques: the sophisticated laboratory-based AutoScan system and the portable TinyPerm 3 field device both from New England Research (NER). Two sets of permeability data comprising 64 measurements were obtained and analyzed graphically using Whisker Box Plots, Bland-Altman Plot, Curve Matching, and Cross Plots, as well as statistically through correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The graphical analysis revealed no substantial difference in permeability measured by the two methods, a finding further supported by ANOVA results, which indicated no statistically significant difference (P-value > 0.05). Additionally, the correlation plot between the permeability measurements from the two methods yielded a straight line with an R $$^2$$ value greater than 0.9, demonstrating a strong agreement. This study highlights the potential of using portable handheld permeameters to measure spot permeability of bioturbated strata in the field, offering a cost-effective, accurate, and real-time alternative to laboratory-based techniques in estimating their bulk permeability.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00697-wSpot permeabilityTinyPerm 3AutoScanBland-Altman plotCarbonateOutcrop
spellingShingle Ayman Al-Lehyani
Hassan A. Eltom
Abdullatif Al-Shuhail
Eassa Abdullah
Ammar El-Husseiny
Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
Scientific Reports
Spot permeability
TinyPerm 3
AutoScan
Bland-Altman plot
Carbonate
Outcrop
title Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
title_full Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
title_fullStr Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
title_short Comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
title_sort comparative study of laboratory and portable spot permeability measurements in bioturbated carbonate strata
topic Spot permeability
TinyPerm 3
AutoScan
Bland-Altman plot
Carbonate
Outcrop
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00697-w
work_keys_str_mv AT aymanallehyani comparativestudyoflaboratoryandportablespotpermeabilitymeasurementsinbioturbatedcarbonatestrata
AT hassanaeltom comparativestudyoflaboratoryandportablespotpermeabilitymeasurementsinbioturbatedcarbonatestrata
AT abdullatifalshuhail comparativestudyoflaboratoryandportablespotpermeabilitymeasurementsinbioturbatedcarbonatestrata
AT eassaabdullah comparativestudyoflaboratoryandportablespotpermeabilitymeasurementsinbioturbatedcarbonatestrata
AT ammarelhusseiny comparativestudyoflaboratoryandportablespotpermeabilitymeasurementsinbioturbatedcarbonatestrata