Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)

Vulnerability impacts have increased in an unprecedented way with the effects of global warming, climate change, erosion, sea level rise, tsunami, flood, and drought—natural events that jointly cause geomorphological changes, especially in coastal zones. There are no analytical mathematical formulat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zekâi Şen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/5/978
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849711270567084032
author Zekâi Şen
author_facet Zekâi Şen
author_sort Zekâi Şen
collection DOAJ
description Vulnerability impacts have increased in an unprecedented way with the effects of global warming, climate change, erosion, sea level rise, tsunami, flood, and drought—natural events that jointly cause geomorphological changes, especially in coastal zones. There are no analytical mathematical formulations under a set of assumptions due to the complexity of the interactive associations of these natural events, and the only way that seems open in the literature is through empirical formulations that depend on expert experiences. Among such empirical formulations are the Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI), the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), the Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI), and the Integrated Coastal Vulnerability Index (ICVI), which is composed of the previous indices. Although there is basic experience and experimental information for the establishment of these indices, unfortunately, logical aspects are missing. This paper proposes a Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI) based on fuzzy logic, aiming to improve the limitations of the traditional Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI). Traditional CVI relies on binary logic and calculates vulnerability through discrete classification (such as “low”, “medium”, and “high”) and arithmetic or geometric means. It has problems such as mutation risk division, ignoring data continuity, and unreasonable parameter weights. To this end, the author introduced fuzzy logic, quantified the nonlinear effects of various parameters (such as landforms, coastal slope, sea level changes, etc.) through fuzzy sets and membership degrees, and calculated CFVI using a weighted average method. The study showed that CFVI allows continuous transition risk assessment by fuzzifying the parameter data range, avoiding the “mutation” defect of traditional methods. Taking data from the Gulf of Mexico in the United States as an example, the calculation result range of CFVI (0.38–3.04) is significantly smaller than that of traditional CVI (0.42–51), which is closer to the rationality of actual vulnerability changes. The paper also criticized the defects of traditional CVI, being that it relies on subjective experience and lacks a logical basis, and pointed out that CFVI can be expanded to integrate more variables or combined with other indices (such as the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI)) to provide a more scientific basis for coastal management decisions. This study optimized the coastal vulnerability assessment method through fuzzy logic, improved the ability to handle nonlinear relationships between parameters, and provided a new tool for complex and dynamic coastal risk management. Further research possibilities are also mentioned throughout the text and in the Conclusion section.
format Article
id doaj-art-6dbd2f367b4542bbb706c43a15286a61
institution DOAJ
issn 2077-1312
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
spelling doaj-art-6dbd2f367b4542bbb706c43a15286a612025-08-20T03:14:39ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122025-05-0113597810.3390/jmse13050978Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)Zekâi Şen0Engineering and Natural Sciences Faculty, Istanbul Medipol University, Beykoz 34815, TürkiyeVulnerability impacts have increased in an unprecedented way with the effects of global warming, climate change, erosion, sea level rise, tsunami, flood, and drought—natural events that jointly cause geomorphological changes, especially in coastal zones. There are no analytical mathematical formulations under a set of assumptions due to the complexity of the interactive associations of these natural events, and the only way that seems open in the literature is through empirical formulations that depend on expert experiences. Among such empirical formulations are the Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI), the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI), the Socioeconomic Vulnerability Index (SVI), and the Integrated Coastal Vulnerability Index (ICVI), which is composed of the previous indices. Although there is basic experience and experimental information for the establishment of these indices, unfortunately, logical aspects are missing. This paper proposes a Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI) based on fuzzy logic, aiming to improve the limitations of the traditional Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI). Traditional CVI relies on binary logic and calculates vulnerability through discrete classification (such as “low”, “medium”, and “high”) and arithmetic or geometric means. It has problems such as mutation risk division, ignoring data continuity, and unreasonable parameter weights. To this end, the author introduced fuzzy logic, quantified the nonlinear effects of various parameters (such as landforms, coastal slope, sea level changes, etc.) through fuzzy sets and membership degrees, and calculated CFVI using a weighted average method. The study showed that CFVI allows continuous transition risk assessment by fuzzifying the parameter data range, avoiding the “mutation” defect of traditional methods. Taking data from the Gulf of Mexico in the United States as an example, the calculation result range of CFVI (0.38–3.04) is significantly smaller than that of traditional CVI (0.42–51), which is closer to the rationality of actual vulnerability changes. The paper also criticized the defects of traditional CVI, being that it relies on subjective experience and lacks a logical basis, and pointed out that CFVI can be expanded to integrate more variables or combined with other indices (such as the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI)) to provide a more scientific basis for coastal management decisions. This study optimized the coastal vulnerability assessment method through fuzzy logic, improved the ability to handle nonlinear relationships between parameters, and provided a new tool for complex and dynamic coastal risk management. Further research possibilities are also mentioned throughout the text and in the Conclusion section.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/5/978bivalent logiccoastfuzzy logicindexmembership degreerule base
spellingShingle Zekâi Şen
Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
bivalent logic
coast
fuzzy logic
index
membership degree
rule base
title Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
title_full Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
title_fullStr Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
title_full_unstemmed Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
title_short Navigating Coastal Vulnerability: Introducing the Coastal Fuzzy Vulnerability Index (CFVI)
title_sort navigating coastal vulnerability introducing the coastal fuzzy vulnerability index cfvi
topic bivalent logic
coast
fuzzy logic
index
membership degree
rule base
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/5/978
work_keys_str_mv AT zekaisen navigatingcoastalvulnerabilityintroducingthecoastalfuzzyvulnerabilityindexcfvi