Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials

Objective. The goal of this study was to begin to explore whether the beneficial auditory neural effects of early music training persist throughout life and influence age-related changes in neurophysiological processing of sound. Design. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) elicited by harmon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer L. O’Brien, Dee A. Nikjeh, Jennifer J. Lister
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/545917
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550838441082880
author Jennifer L. O’Brien
Dee A. Nikjeh
Jennifer J. Lister
author_facet Jennifer L. O’Brien
Dee A. Nikjeh
Jennifer J. Lister
author_sort Jennifer L. O’Brien
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The goal of this study was to begin to explore whether the beneficial auditory neural effects of early music training persist throughout life and influence age-related changes in neurophysiological processing of sound. Design. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) elicited by harmonic tone complexes were examined, including P1-N1-P2, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a. Study Sample. Data from older adult musicians (n=8) and nonmusicians (n=8) (ages 55–70 years) were compared to previous data from young adult musicians (n=40) and nonmusicians (n=20) (ages 18–33 years). Results. P1-N1-P2 amplitudes and latencies did not differ between older adult musicians and nonmusicians; however, MMN and P3a latencies for harmonic tone deviances were earlier for older musicians than older nonmusicians. Comparisons of P1-N1-P2, MMN, and P3a components between older and young adult musicians and nonmusicians suggest that P1 and P2 latencies are significantly affected by age, but not musicianship, while MMN and P3a appear to be more sensitive to effects of musicianship than aging. Conclusions. Findings support beneficial influences of musicianship on central auditory function and suggest a positive interaction between aging and musicianship on the auditory neural system.
format Article
id doaj-art-6db2fd78fce2486d9736d5c8417d43c1
institution Kabale University
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-6db2fd78fce2486d9736d5c8417d43c12025-02-03T06:05:38ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842015-01-01201510.1155/2015/545917545917Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked PotentialsJennifer L. O’Brien0Dee A. Nikjeh1Jennifer J. Lister2Department of Psychology, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, 140 7th Street S, DAV 116, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USADepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Tampa, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33621, USADepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Tampa, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33621, USAObjective. The goal of this study was to begin to explore whether the beneficial auditory neural effects of early music training persist throughout life and influence age-related changes in neurophysiological processing of sound. Design. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) elicited by harmonic tone complexes were examined, including P1-N1-P2, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a. Study Sample. Data from older adult musicians (n=8) and nonmusicians (n=8) (ages 55–70 years) were compared to previous data from young adult musicians (n=40) and nonmusicians (n=20) (ages 18–33 years). Results. P1-N1-P2 amplitudes and latencies did not differ between older adult musicians and nonmusicians; however, MMN and P3a latencies for harmonic tone deviances were earlier for older musicians than older nonmusicians. Comparisons of P1-N1-P2, MMN, and P3a components between older and young adult musicians and nonmusicians suggest that P1 and P2 latencies are significantly affected by age, but not musicianship, while MMN and P3a appear to be more sensitive to effects of musicianship than aging. Conclusions. Findings support beneficial influences of musicianship on central auditory function and suggest a positive interaction between aging and musicianship on the auditory neural system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/545917
spellingShingle Jennifer L. O’Brien
Dee A. Nikjeh
Jennifer J. Lister
Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
Behavioural Neurology
title Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_full Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_short Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
title_sort interaction of musicianship and aging a comparison of cortical auditory evoked potentials
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/545917
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferlobrien interactionofmusicianshipandagingacomparisonofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT deeanikjeh interactionofmusicianshipandagingacomparisonofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT jenniferjlister interactionofmusicianshipandagingacomparisonofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials