THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW
As EU law has become richer in terms of quantity and quality, the number of disputes which fall within the jurisdiction of the Member States’ courts has increased, as has the complexity of the issues raised by the parties to these disputes, in which provisions of Union law apply. Thus, the applicati...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2023_articles%252F3_CKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW_009.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850039247125348352 |
|---|---|
| author | Marian GOCIU |
| author_facet | Marian GOCIU |
| author_sort | Marian GOCIU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As EU law has become richer in terms of quantity and quality, the number of disputes which fall within the jurisdiction of the Member States’ courts has increased, as has the complexity of the issues raised by the parties to these disputes, in which provisions of Union law apply. Thus, the application of the provisions of EU law by national courts raises certain important issues, in particular with regard to the jurisdiction on interpreting EU law, which is a prerequisite for its application.
Under art. 267 TFEU, the CJEU has jurisdiction to render a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the Treaties and of legal acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union.
The aim of this study is to discover whether this article gives the CJEU exclusive jurisdiction to interpret Union law, or whether national courts also have such jurisdiction, in which cases they may interpret and apply Union law without resorting to the preliminary ruling mechanism. In the latter situation, we will identify the limits of this jurisdiction in relation to the principle of autonomous interpretation of Union law. The study can be a very useful instrument both for Romanian and Member States’ courts and other practitioners. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6d6ad07716eb4e6991bbe01b97f941ae |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-6d6ad07716eb4e6991bbe01b97f941ae2025-08-20T02:56:24ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962023-06-01161282292THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAWMarian GOCIU0PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, „Nicolae Titulescu” University (e-mail: marian17gociu@gmail.com).As EU law has become richer in terms of quantity and quality, the number of disputes which fall within the jurisdiction of the Member States’ courts has increased, as has the complexity of the issues raised by the parties to these disputes, in which provisions of Union law apply. Thus, the application of the provisions of EU law by national courts raises certain important issues, in particular with regard to the jurisdiction on interpreting EU law, which is a prerequisite for its application. Under art. 267 TFEU, the CJEU has jurisdiction to render a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of the Treaties and of legal acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union. The aim of this study is to discover whether this article gives the CJEU exclusive jurisdiction to interpret Union law, or whether national courts also have such jurisdiction, in which cases they may interpret and apply Union law without resorting to the preliminary ruling mechanism. In the latter situation, we will identify the limits of this jurisdiction in relation to the principle of autonomous interpretation of Union law. The study can be a very useful instrument both for Romanian and Member States’ courts and other practitioners.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2023_articles%252F3_CKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW_009.pdfinterpretation of union lawthe principle of autonomous interpretationcriteriajurisdictionlimits |
| spellingShingle | Marian GOCIU THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW Challenges of the Knowledge Society interpretation of union law the principle of autonomous interpretation criteria jurisdiction limits |
| title | THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW |
| title_full | THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW |
| title_fullStr | THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW |
| title_short | THE PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND LIMITS OF MEMBER STATES' COURTS IN INTERPRETING EU LAW |
| title_sort | principle of autonomous interpretation and limits of member states courts in interpreting eu law |
| topic | interpretation of union law the principle of autonomous interpretation criteria jurisdiction limits |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2023_articles%252F3_CKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW%252FCKS_2023_PUBLIC_LAW_009.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariangociu theprincipleofautonomousinterpretationandlimitsofmemberstatescourtsininterpretingeulaw AT mariangociu principleofautonomousinterpretationandlimitsofmemberstatescourtsininterpretingeulaw |