“His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico
Abstract The querelle caldéronienne marks the entry of Frühromantik theories in Spain. In this polemic, the literati José Joaquín de Mora and Antonio Alcalá Galiano defended a neoclassical conception of literature, while the German-Gaditan couple Juan Nicolás Böhl de Faber and Francisca Larrea promo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Estudios de Teoría Literaria |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/8027 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850129712630726656 |
|---|---|
| author | Carmen Calzada Borrallo |
| author_facet | Carmen Calzada Borrallo |
| author_sort | Carmen Calzada Borrallo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The querelle caldéronienne marks the entry of Frühromantik theories in Spain. In this polemic, the literati José Joaquín de Mora and Antonio Alcalá Galiano defended a neoclassical conception of literature, while the German-Gaditan couple Juan Nicolás Böhl de Faber and Francisca Larrea promoted August Wilhelm Schlegel’s vindication of Calderón. The second phase of the polemic dates from 1818-1820, when Böhl de Faber published the Pasatiempos críticos. This study analyses the five texts that Larrea contributed to the Pasatiempos under the pseudonym Cymodocea. Our aim is to investigate, on the one hand, how Larrea's discourse is configured within the polemic as a second voice in support of Böhl de Faber's, and, on the other, the main ideas she contributed. A preliminary review of her first public texts, written during the Spanish War of Independence, allows us to detect various strategies for weaponizing female authorship which will appear in the Pasatiempos. The content analysis, on the other hand, shows us the depth of the author's literary knowledge, as well as the political motives under her literary ideals |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6d3cac8cd99c4b4a9006ea4f0cbe350a |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2313-9676 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Estudios de Teoría Literaria |
| spelling | doaj-art-6d3cac8cd99c4b4a9006ea4f0cbe350a2025-08-20T02:32:53ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataEstudios de Teoría Literaria2313-96762024-11-01133274856094“His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo críticoCarmen Calzada Borrallo0Universidad de SevillaAbstract The querelle caldéronienne marks the entry of Frühromantik theories in Spain. In this polemic, the literati José Joaquín de Mora and Antonio Alcalá Galiano defended a neoclassical conception of literature, while the German-Gaditan couple Juan Nicolás Böhl de Faber and Francisca Larrea promoted August Wilhelm Schlegel’s vindication of Calderón. The second phase of the polemic dates from 1818-1820, when Böhl de Faber published the Pasatiempos críticos. This study analyses the five texts that Larrea contributed to the Pasatiempos under the pseudonym Cymodocea. Our aim is to investigate, on the one hand, how Larrea's discourse is configured within the polemic as a second voice in support of Böhl de Faber's, and, on the other, the main ideas she contributed. A preliminary review of her first public texts, written during the Spanish War of Independence, allows us to detect various strategies for weaponizing female authorship which will appear in the Pasatiempos. The content analysis, on the other hand, shows us the depth of the author's literary knowledge, as well as the political motives under her literary idealshttp://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/8027francisca ruiz de larrearomanticismo reaccionariocalderónconstrucción autorial femeninaantimodernidad. |
| spellingShingle | Carmen Calzada Borrallo “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico Estudios de Teoría Literaria francisca ruiz de larrea romanticismo reaccionario calderón construcción autorial femenina antimodernidad. |
| title | “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico |
| title_full | “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico |
| title_fullStr | “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico |
| title_full_unstemmed | “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico |
| title_short | “His only advocate”. Francisca Ruiz de Larrea as secondary voice in the Pasatiempo crítico |
| title_sort | his only advocate francisca ruiz de larrea as secondary voice in the pasatiempo critico |
| topic | francisca ruiz de larrea romanticismo reaccionario calderón construcción autorial femenina antimodernidad. |
| url | http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/etl/article/view/8027 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carmencalzadaborrallo hisonlyadvocatefranciscaruizdelarreaassecondaryvoiceinthepasatiempocritico |