Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

The purpose of this study was to investigate comparison between oral zinc sulfate and meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). So 100 patients with CL were included and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was treated with oral zinc sulfate (10 mg/kg/day d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamad Javad Yazdanpanah, Mahnaz Banihashemi, Fakhrozaman Pezeshkpoor, Mohammad Khajedaluee, Sororozaman Famili, Iman Tavakoli Rodi, Hadis Yousefzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Dermatology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/269515
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561849670828032
author Mohamad Javad Yazdanpanah
Mahnaz Banihashemi
Fakhrozaman Pezeshkpoor
Mohammad Khajedaluee
Sororozaman Famili
Iman Tavakoli Rodi
Hadis Yousefzadeh
author_facet Mohamad Javad Yazdanpanah
Mahnaz Banihashemi
Fakhrozaman Pezeshkpoor
Mohammad Khajedaluee
Sororozaman Famili
Iman Tavakoli Rodi
Hadis Yousefzadeh
author_sort Mohamad Javad Yazdanpanah
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to investigate comparison between oral zinc sulfate and meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). So 100 patients with CL were included and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was treated with oral zinc sulfate (10 mg/kg/day during 45 days period), and the second group was treated with systemic meglumine antimoniate (20 mg/kg/day intramuscularly for 20 days). Acceptable cure after completing 45 days of followup occurred in 30.2% of lesions in first group, while this was 35.5% for the second group. There is not any significant difference between the two treatment groups (𝑃=0.42). Serious side effects resulting in treatment discounting occurred in only meglumine antimoniate group. Although cure rate of systemic meglumine antimoniate group was better the treatment with zinc sulfate is much easier, cheaper, more convenient in consumption, safer, and nearly close cure percentage to systemic meglumine antimoniate injections without serious side effect.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d3616c4db344367a5ee833fefe25856
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6105
1687-6113
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Dermatology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-6d3616c4db344367a5ee833fefe258562025-02-03T01:24:00ZengWileyDermatology Research and Practice1687-61051687-61132011-01-01201110.1155/2011/269515269515Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous LeishmaniasisMohamad Javad Yazdanpanah0Mahnaz Banihashemi1Fakhrozaman Pezeshkpoor2Mohammad Khajedaluee3Sororozaman Famili4Iman Tavakoli Rodi5Hadis Yousefzadeh6Research Center for Skin Disease and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Ghaem Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranResearch Center for Skin Disease and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Ghaem Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranResearch Center for Skin Disease and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Ghaem Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranDepartment of Social Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranResearch Center for Skin Disease and Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Ghaem Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranMashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, IranYoung Researcher's Club, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad branch, IranThe purpose of this study was to investigate comparison between oral zinc sulfate and meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). So 100 patients with CL were included and randomly divided into two groups. The first group was treated with oral zinc sulfate (10 mg/kg/day during 45 days period), and the second group was treated with systemic meglumine antimoniate (20 mg/kg/day intramuscularly for 20 days). Acceptable cure after completing 45 days of followup occurred in 30.2% of lesions in first group, while this was 35.5% for the second group. There is not any significant difference between the two treatment groups (𝑃=0.42). Serious side effects resulting in treatment discounting occurred in only meglumine antimoniate group. Although cure rate of systemic meglumine antimoniate group was better the treatment with zinc sulfate is much easier, cheaper, more convenient in consumption, safer, and nearly close cure percentage to systemic meglumine antimoniate injections without serious side effect.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/269515
spellingShingle Mohamad Javad Yazdanpanah
Mahnaz Banihashemi
Fakhrozaman Pezeshkpoor
Mohammad Khajedaluee
Sororozaman Famili
Iman Tavakoli Rodi
Hadis Yousefzadeh
Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
Dermatology Research and Practice
title Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_full Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_short Comparison of Oral Zinc Sulfate with Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
title_sort comparison of oral zinc sulfate with systemic meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/269515
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadjavadyazdanpanah comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT mahnazbanihashemi comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT fakhrozamanpezeshkpoor comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT mohammadkhajedaluee comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT sororozamanfamili comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT imantavakolirodi comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis
AT hadisyousefzadeh comparisonoforalzincsulfatewithsystemicmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasis