Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices

Abstract Background and objective The EFSUMB recommends the use of handheld ultrasound devices in many point-of-care cases, including primary care. However, it is necessary to continue training in conventional ultrasound examinations. Our aim is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultraso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Segura-Grau, Ines Salcedo-Joven, Esther Montes-Belloso, Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Elena Segura-Grau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-08-01
Series:The Ultrasound Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00433-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849388151249829888
author Ana Segura-Grau
Ines Salcedo-Joven
Esther Montes-Belloso
Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo
Antonio Segura-Fragoso
Elena Segura-Grau
author_facet Ana Segura-Grau
Ines Salcedo-Joven
Esther Montes-Belloso
Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo
Antonio Segura-Fragoso
Elena Segura-Grau
author_sort Ana Segura-Grau
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and objective The EFSUMB recommends the use of handheld ultrasound devices in many point-of-care cases, including primary care. However, it is necessary to continue training in conventional ultrasound examinations. Our aim is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultrasound devices in abdominal pathology compared with conventional high-end ultrasound scanners. Methodology Agreement study between two ultrasound techniques, (1) POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound), with a General Electric® Vscan Air device and (2) standard ultrasound with a high-end Samsung RS 80® ultrasound scanner. Cohen’s kappa was used for the analysis. The study was conducted between November 2022 and September 2023 in the general ultrasound unit of the San Francisco de Asís University Hospital in Madrid. It included all patients from the emergency department and the inpatient unit who have been referred for abdominal ultrasound. Results A total of 93 patients were included (52.7% were women and the mean age was 65.6 (23.6) years). As regards body mass index (BMI), 11.8% had a BMI over 30 kg/m2. Of the scans performed, 69.9% were abdominal and the rest urological. Overall, the degree of agreement between the two tests was 89%, with 100% for liver and bladder pathology, 86.2% for renal pathology and 82.5% for complicated renal pathology. Intestinal (73.3%) and pancreatic (58.1%) pathologies showed the lowest correlation. Conclusions The degree of agreement of handheld devices is high (89%), especially in renal and bladder pathologies, where ultrasound is decisive in decision-making. The agreement is weaker in pancreatic and gastrointestinal tract pathologies.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d282cef2fe34c58adbfa1a1fb212fed
institution Kabale University
issn 2524-8987
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Ultrasound Journal
spelling doaj-art-6d282cef2fe34c58adbfa1a1fb212fed2025-08-20T03:42:23ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872025-08-011711710.1186/s13089-025-00433-5Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devicesAna Segura-Grau0Ines Salcedo-Joven1Esther Montes-Belloso2Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo3Antonio Segura-Fragoso4Elena Segura-Grau5Family and Community Medicine, Ultrasound Unit, San Francisco de Asis HospitalFamily and Community Medicine, Korea Strait Health Centre, Health Area of MadridFamily and Community Medicine, Isabel II Health Centre, Health Area of Parla Family and Community Medicine, Milladoiro, Health Centre, Health AreaEpidemiology Unit, Semergen’s Research AgencyHospitalar ULS Viseu Dao LafoesAbstract Background and objective The EFSUMB recommends the use of handheld ultrasound devices in many point-of-care cases, including primary care. However, it is necessary to continue training in conventional ultrasound examinations. Our aim is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultrasound devices in abdominal pathology compared with conventional high-end ultrasound scanners. Methodology Agreement study between two ultrasound techniques, (1) POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound), with a General Electric® Vscan Air device and (2) standard ultrasound with a high-end Samsung RS 80® ultrasound scanner. Cohen’s kappa was used for the analysis. The study was conducted between November 2022 and September 2023 in the general ultrasound unit of the San Francisco de Asís University Hospital in Madrid. It included all patients from the emergency department and the inpatient unit who have been referred for abdominal ultrasound. Results A total of 93 patients were included (52.7% were women and the mean age was 65.6 (23.6) years). As regards body mass index (BMI), 11.8% had a BMI over 30 kg/m2. Of the scans performed, 69.9% were abdominal and the rest urological. Overall, the degree of agreement between the two tests was 89%, with 100% for liver and bladder pathology, 86.2% for renal pathology and 82.5% for complicated renal pathology. Intestinal (73.3%) and pancreatic (58.1%) pathologies showed the lowest correlation. Conclusions The degree of agreement of handheld devices is high (89%), especially in renal and bladder pathologies, where ultrasound is decisive in decision-making. The agreement is weaker in pancreatic and gastrointestinal tract pathologies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00433-5Abdominal ultrasoundPortable devicesPOCUSAgreement
spellingShingle Ana Segura-Grau
Ines Salcedo-Joven
Esther Montes-Belloso
Sergio Cinza-Sanjurjo
Antonio Segura-Fragoso
Elena Segura-Grau
Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
The Ultrasound Journal
Abdominal ultrasound
Portable devices
POCUS
Agreement
title Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
title_full Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
title_fullStr Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
title_short Usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high-end ultrasound devices
title_sort usefulness of handheld ultrasound devices in the assessment of abdominal pathology and comparison with high end ultrasound devices
topic Abdominal ultrasound
Portable devices
POCUS
Agreement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00433-5
work_keys_str_mv AT anaseguragrau usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices
AT inessalcedojoven usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices
AT esthermontesbelloso usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices
AT sergiocinzasanjurjo usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices
AT antoniosegurafragoso usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices
AT elenaseguragrau usefulnessofhandheldultrasounddevicesintheassessmentofabdominalpathologyandcomparisonwithhighendultrasounddevices