Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance

Abstract Recently, Biagioli and Tompkins (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003231) used a simple stochastic model to derive a dimensionless parameter to predict convective self aggregation (SA) development, which was based on the derivation of the maximum free convective distance dclr expected in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Casallas, A. M. Tompkins, C. Muller, G. Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2025-03-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004791
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850206837497921536
author A. Casallas
A. M. Tompkins
C. Muller
G. Thompson
author_facet A. Casallas
A. M. Tompkins
C. Muller
G. Thompson
author_sort A. Casallas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recently, Biagioli and Tompkins (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003231) used a simple stochastic model to derive a dimensionless parameter to predict convective self aggregation (SA) development, which was based on the derivation of the maximum free convective distance dclr expected in the pre‐aggregated, random state. Our goal is to test and further investigate this hypothesis, namely that dclr can predict SA occurrence, using an ensemble of 24 distinct combinations of horizontal mixing, planetary boundary layer (PBL), and microphysical parameterizations. We conclude that the key impact of parameterization schemes on SA is through their control of the number of convective cores and their relative spacing, dclr, which itself is impacted by cold‐pool (CP) properties and mean updraft core size. SA is more likely when the convective core count is small, while CPs modify convective spacing via suppression in their interiors and triggering by gust‐front convergence and collisions. Each parameterization scheme emphasizes a different mechanism. Subgrid‐scale horizontal turbulent mixing mainly affects SA through the determination of convective core size and thus spacing. The sensitivity to the microphysics is mainly through rain evaporation and the subsequent impact on CPs, while perturbations to the ice cloud microphysics have a limited effect. Non‐local PBL mixing schemes promote SA primarily by increasing convective inhibition through inversion entrainment and altering low cloud amounts, leading to fewer convective cores and larger dclr.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d149d175c344755811327f8e151e6cd
institution OA Journals
issn 1942-2466
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj-art-6d149d175c344755811327f8e151e6cd2025-08-20T02:10:41ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662025-03-01173n/an/a10.1029/2024MS004791Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection DistanceA. Casallas0A. M. Tompkins1C. Muller2G. Thompson3Earth System Physics International Centre for Theoretical Physics Trieste ItalyEarth System Physics International Centre for Theoretical Physics Trieste ItalyInstitute of Science and Technology Austria Klosterneuburg AustriaGeneral Electrics Aerospace Cincinnati OH USAAbstract Recently, Biagioli and Tompkins (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ms003231) used a simple stochastic model to derive a dimensionless parameter to predict convective self aggregation (SA) development, which was based on the derivation of the maximum free convective distance dclr expected in the pre‐aggregated, random state. Our goal is to test and further investigate this hypothesis, namely that dclr can predict SA occurrence, using an ensemble of 24 distinct combinations of horizontal mixing, planetary boundary layer (PBL), and microphysical parameterizations. We conclude that the key impact of parameterization schemes on SA is through their control of the number of convective cores and their relative spacing, dclr, which itself is impacted by cold‐pool (CP) properties and mean updraft core size. SA is more likely when the convective core count is small, while CPs modify convective spacing via suppression in their interiors and triggering by gust‐front convergence and collisions. Each parameterization scheme emphasizes a different mechanism. Subgrid‐scale horizontal turbulent mixing mainly affects SA through the determination of convective core size and thus spacing. The sensitivity to the microphysics is mainly through rain evaporation and the subsequent impact on CPs, while perturbations to the ice cloud microphysics have a limited effect. Non‐local PBL mixing schemes promote SA primarily by increasing convective inhibition through inversion entrainment and altering low cloud amounts, leading to fewer convective cores and larger dclr.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004791
spellingShingle A. Casallas
A. M. Tompkins
C. Muller
G. Thompson
Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
title Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
title_full Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
title_fullStr Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
title_short Sensitivity of Self‐Aggregation and the Key Role of the Free Convection Distance
title_sort sensitivity of self aggregation and the key role of the free convection distance
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004791
work_keys_str_mv AT acasallas sensitivityofselfaggregationandthekeyroleofthefreeconvectiondistance
AT amtompkins sensitivityofselfaggregationandthekeyroleofthefreeconvectiondistance
AT cmuller sensitivityofselfaggregationandthekeyroleofthefreeconvectiondistance
AT gthompson sensitivityofselfaggregationandthekeyroleofthefreeconvectiondistance