MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE

Nowadays conception of blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) includes a number of indicators related to various physiological factors. All the indexes are calculated with the standard deviation (SD) or more complex formulas, including SD. BPV main varieties are considered a 24-hour BPV (measured by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. M. Gorbunov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Столичная издательская компания 2015-12-01
Series:Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/641
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849227870537252864
author V. M. Gorbunov
author_facet V. M. Gorbunov
author_sort V. M. Gorbunov
collection DOAJ
description Nowadays conception of blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) includes a number of indicators related to various physiological factors. All the indexes are calculated with the standard deviation (SD) or more complex formulas, including SD. BPV main varieties are considered a 24-hour BPV (measured by ambulatory BP monitoring – ABPM), midterm BPV (BP self-control or home BP – HBP), and long-term, visit-to-visit, BPV (traditional BP measurement or office BP – OBP). The 24-hour BPV was the main subject of study for many years. Recently significant attention has been paid to the visit-to-visit BPV assessment. Retrospective meta-analysis showed that in a cohort of patients after stroke or transient ischemic attack, this index was a strong and independent (from the average BP level) predictor of stroke. In ASCOT-BPLA study visit-to-visit systolic BPV also was a strong predictor of stroke and coronary events. Long-term BPV in patients of amlodipine/perindopril treatment group was significantly lower than this in patients of atenolol/diuretic group during the follow-up that was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular complications. However , the concept of visit-to-visit BPV use for risk stratification and monitoring of antihypertensive therapy efficacy is associated with significant limitations (basic data is obtained in the post hoc analysis, difficulties in objective evaluation of prognostic significance of indicators, their dependence on medication adherence, etc.). The HBP self-control is a promising approach to the BPV analysis; it may be the "happy medium" between ABPM and OPB. New-designed prospective comparative studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of the various BPV parameters.
format Article
id doaj-art-6d0be12a435b4b9bae6021bc775903a7
institution Kabale University
issn 1819-6446
2225-3653
language English
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Столичная издательская компания
record_format Article
series Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
spelling doaj-art-6d0be12a435b4b9bae6021bc775903a72025-08-23T10:00:21ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532015-12-018681081810.20996/1819-6446-2012-8-6-810-818640MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSUREV. M. Gorbunov0State Research Center for Preventive MedicineNowadays conception of blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) includes a number of indicators related to various physiological factors. All the indexes are calculated with the standard deviation (SD) or more complex formulas, including SD. BPV main varieties are considered a 24-hour BPV (measured by ambulatory BP monitoring – ABPM), midterm BPV (BP self-control or home BP – HBP), and long-term, visit-to-visit, BPV (traditional BP measurement or office BP – OBP). The 24-hour BPV was the main subject of study for many years. Recently significant attention has been paid to the visit-to-visit BPV assessment. Retrospective meta-analysis showed that in a cohort of patients after stroke or transient ischemic attack, this index was a strong and independent (from the average BP level) predictor of stroke. In ASCOT-BPLA study visit-to-visit systolic BPV also was a strong predictor of stroke and coronary events. Long-term BPV in patients of amlodipine/perindopril treatment group was significantly lower than this in patients of atenolol/diuretic group during the follow-up that was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular complications. However , the concept of visit-to-visit BPV use for risk stratification and monitoring of antihypertensive therapy efficacy is associated with significant limitations (basic data is obtained in the post hoc analysis, difficulties in objective evaluation of prognostic significance of indicators, their dependence on medication adherence, etc.). The HBP self-control is a promising approach to the BPV analysis; it may be the "happy medium" between ABPM and OPB. New-designed prospective comparative studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of the various BPV parameters.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/641arterial hypertensionblood pressure variabilityoffice blood pressureambulatory blood pressurehome blood pressure
spellingShingle V. M. Gorbunov
MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
arterial hypertension
blood pressure variability
office blood pressure
ambulatory blood pressure
home blood pressure
title MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
title_full MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
title_fullStr MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
title_full_unstemmed MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
title_short MODERN VIEWS ON THE VARIABILITY OF BLOOD PRESSURE
title_sort modern views on the variability of blood pressure
topic arterial hypertension
blood pressure variability
office blood pressure
ambulatory blood pressure
home blood pressure
url https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/641
work_keys_str_mv AT vmgorbunov modernviewsonthevariabilityofbloodpressure