Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs

Abstract Background The prevalence of smoking opioids and other unregulated drugs has increased across the United States (U.S.) since 2000. Improved access to safer smoking supplies may reduce the health consequences of inhalation while helping to engage more people who use drugs in syringe services...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William H. Eger, Angel K. Gomez, Kirstin Kielhold, Tyler S. Bartholomew, Angela R. Bazzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:Implementation Science Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00714-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850063481024282624
author William H. Eger
Angel K. Gomez
Kirstin Kielhold
Tyler S. Bartholomew
Angela R. Bazzi
author_facet William H. Eger
Angel K. Gomez
Kirstin Kielhold
Tyler S. Bartholomew
Angela R. Bazzi
author_sort William H. Eger
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The prevalence of smoking opioids and other unregulated drugs has increased across the United States (U.S.) since 2000. Improved access to safer smoking supplies may reduce the health consequences of inhalation while helping to engage more people who use drugs in syringe services programs (SSPs); however, the landscape of safer smoking supply implementation is understudied. Methods From November 2023–January 2024, we surveyed representatives of U.S. SSPs to assess safer smoking supply implementation across contextual domains of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Descriptive statistics were used to describe determinants across the phases of safer smoking supply implementation. Poisson regression identified factors associated with implementation. Results Among 118 organizations responding to the survey, most received state funding (83%), were community-based organizations (CBOs; 74%), and served urban jurisdictions (62%). The majority (67%) were already providing safer smoking supplies; 16% were exploring implementation and 11% were not. On average, safer smoking supply implementation occurred more recently than the provision of syringes (1–2 years ago vs. > 5 years ago), with participant request being the most common motivation for implementation (84%). Additional facilitators of safer smoking supply implementation were organizational prioritization (65%) and internal leadership support (57%). Factors significantly associated with safer smoking supply implementation included being from the Northeastern or Western regions (vs. the U.S. South), serving exurban communities, being a CBO, receiving foundation funding, receiving private donations from fundraising, and offering syringes and other injection alternatives (e.g., safer snorting supplies). Receiving federal funding, fear of external community opposition, internal leadership opposition, and respondent uncertainty about changing demand for safer smoking supplies (vs. perceiving that demand has not changed) were negatively associated with implementation. Conclusions Determinants in the inner context, like organizational prioritization of safer smoking supplies and internal leadership support, may facilitate safer smoking supply implementation, while specific outer context factors (e.g., funding, regional policies) may inhibit implementation. Flexible policies and funding structures and further research to build and disseminate evidence on the benefits of safer smoking supplies are needed to expand the implementation and scale-up of this prevention service within U.S. SSPs.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ce70ed3e0a140f4bed6c1beaefa3f17
institution DOAJ
issn 2662-2211
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science Communications
spelling doaj-art-6ce70ed3e0a140f4bed6c1beaefa3f172025-08-20T02:49:35ZengBMCImplementation Science Communications2662-22112025-03-016111410.1186/s43058-025-00714-zImplementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programsWilliam H. Eger0Angel K. Gomez1Kirstin Kielhold2Tyler S. Bartholomew3Angela R. Bazzi4School of Social Work, San Diego State UniversityAIDS UnitedSchool of Public Health, San Diego State UniversityDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of MiamiHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San DiegoAbstract Background The prevalence of smoking opioids and other unregulated drugs has increased across the United States (U.S.) since 2000. Improved access to safer smoking supplies may reduce the health consequences of inhalation while helping to engage more people who use drugs in syringe services programs (SSPs); however, the landscape of safer smoking supply implementation is understudied. Methods From November 2023–January 2024, we surveyed representatives of U.S. SSPs to assess safer smoking supply implementation across contextual domains of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Descriptive statistics were used to describe determinants across the phases of safer smoking supply implementation. Poisson regression identified factors associated with implementation. Results Among 118 organizations responding to the survey, most received state funding (83%), were community-based organizations (CBOs; 74%), and served urban jurisdictions (62%). The majority (67%) were already providing safer smoking supplies; 16% were exploring implementation and 11% were not. On average, safer smoking supply implementation occurred more recently than the provision of syringes (1–2 years ago vs. > 5 years ago), with participant request being the most common motivation for implementation (84%). Additional facilitators of safer smoking supply implementation were organizational prioritization (65%) and internal leadership support (57%). Factors significantly associated with safer smoking supply implementation included being from the Northeastern or Western regions (vs. the U.S. South), serving exurban communities, being a CBO, receiving foundation funding, receiving private donations from fundraising, and offering syringes and other injection alternatives (e.g., safer snorting supplies). Receiving federal funding, fear of external community opposition, internal leadership opposition, and respondent uncertainty about changing demand for safer smoking supplies (vs. perceiving that demand has not changed) were negatively associated with implementation. Conclusions Determinants in the inner context, like organizational prioritization of safer smoking supplies and internal leadership support, may facilitate safer smoking supply implementation, while specific outer context factors (e.g., funding, regional policies) may inhibit implementation. Flexible policies and funding structures and further research to build and disseminate evidence on the benefits of safer smoking supplies are needed to expand the implementation and scale-up of this prevention service within U.S. SSPs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00714-zSafer smoking suppliesSmokingSyringe services programsImplementationOpioids
spellingShingle William H. Eger
Angel K. Gomez
Kirstin Kielhold
Tyler S. Bartholomew
Angela R. Bazzi
Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
Implementation Science Communications
Safer smoking supplies
Smoking
Syringe services programs
Implementation
Opioids
title Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
title_full Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
title_fullStr Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
title_full_unstemmed Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
title_short Implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in U.S. syringe services programs
title_sort implementation determinants of safer smoking supplies in u s syringe services programs
topic Safer smoking supplies
Smoking
Syringe services programs
Implementation
Opioids
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00714-z
work_keys_str_mv AT williamheger implementationdeterminantsofsafersmokingsuppliesinussyringeservicesprograms
AT angelkgomez implementationdeterminantsofsafersmokingsuppliesinussyringeservicesprograms
AT kirstinkielhold implementationdeterminantsofsafersmokingsuppliesinussyringeservicesprograms
AT tylersbartholomew implementationdeterminantsofsafersmokingsuppliesinussyringeservicesprograms
AT angelarbazzi implementationdeterminantsofsafersmokingsuppliesinussyringeservicesprograms