The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.

The aim of this study is to investigate the reception of Apphia (who is mentioned in Philemon 2 as one of the recipients of the letter) in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E. For this purpose the available sources are investigated in a chronological order: Jerome, John Chrysostom, Pelagius, Theodor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. F. Tolmie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2016-06-01
Series:Acta Theologica
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823858843659010048
author D. F. Tolmie
author_facet D. F. Tolmie
author_sort D. F. Tolmie
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study is to investigate the reception of Apphia (who is mentioned in Philemon 2 as one of the recipients of the letter) in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E. For this purpose the available sources are investigated in a chronological order: Jerome, John Chrysostom, Pelagius, Theodore of Mopsuestia and Theodoret of Cyrus (Apphia is not mentioned in the commentary of Ambrosiaster). Firstly, it is shown that the difference in the Biblical texts that were used by these five scholars may have had an influence on the way in which they interpreted Apphia’s role. Secondly, it is argued that one can identify a slow progression in the way in which the relationship between Philemon, Apphia and Archippus was interpreted. Lastly it is shown that personal views on women and their role had no mean influence on the perception of Apphia. For example, this can be seen in the way in which some of these authors tried to explain why Apphia was mentioned before Archippus in Paul’s letter.
format Article
id doaj-art-6cc9d9e9e4bc44fd927a8a3b2347f071
institution Kabale University
issn 1015-8758
2309-9089
language English
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Theologica
spelling doaj-art-6cc9d9e9e4bc44fd927a8a3b2347f0712025-02-11T09:52:55ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Theologica1015-87582309-90892016-06-012310.38140/at.v0i23.2780The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.D. F. Tolmie0University of the Free State, South Africa The aim of this study is to investigate the reception of Apphia (who is mentioned in Philemon 2 as one of the recipients of the letter) in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E. For this purpose the available sources are investigated in a chronological order: Jerome, John Chrysostom, Pelagius, Theodore of Mopsuestia and Theodoret of Cyrus (Apphia is not mentioned in the commentary of Ambrosiaster). Firstly, it is shown that the difference in the Biblical texts that were used by these five scholars may have had an influence on the way in which they interpreted Apphia’s role. Secondly, it is argued that one can identify a slow progression in the way in which the relationship between Philemon, Apphia and Archippus was interpreted. Lastly it is shown that personal views on women and their role had no mean influence on the perception of Apphia. For example, this can be seen in the way in which some of these authors tried to explain why Apphia was mentioned before Archippus in Paul’s letter. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2780
spellingShingle D. F. Tolmie
The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
Acta Theologica
title The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
title_full The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
title_fullStr The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
title_full_unstemmed The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
title_short The reception of Apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries C.E.
title_sort reception of apphia in the fourth and fifth centuries c e
url https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/at/article/view/2780
work_keys_str_mv AT dftolmie thereceptionofapphiainthefourthandfifthcenturiesce
AT dftolmie receptionofapphiainthefourthandfifthcenturiesce