An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures

Background: Persistent or recurrent instability of the radial head (RH) remains a challenge in treating anterior Monteggia fractures despite anatomic restoration of the ulna. RH instability may be caused by the pull of the biceps muscle with rupture of the annular ligament and other soft tissue stab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirk Vannitamby, MD, Cole T. Fleet, MESc, Carlos Prada, MD, MSc, FEBHS, James A. Johnson, PhD, Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004791
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545510390857728
author Kirk Vannitamby, MD
Cole T. Fleet, MESc
Carlos Prada, MD, MSc, FEBHS
James A. Johnson, PhD
Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
author_facet Kirk Vannitamby, MD
Cole T. Fleet, MESc
Carlos Prada, MD, MSc, FEBHS
James A. Johnson, PhD
Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
author_sort Kirk Vannitamby, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Persistent or recurrent instability of the radial head (RH) remains a challenge in treating anterior Monteggia fractures despite anatomic restoration of the ulna. RH instability may be caused by the pull of the biceps muscle with rupture of the annular ligament and other soft tissue stabilizers of the proximal radius. Currently, the optimal method to stabilize the proximal radius is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare annular ligament repair with three different ligament reconstructions in restoring anterior RH stability. Methods: Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted on an elbow simulator in 90 degrees of flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation. Simulated sequential biceps loading was applied in 10 N increments up to a maximum biceps load of 150 N to generate an anteriorly directed force to the RH. Testing was first conducted in the native state with all soft tissue intact, followed by sectioning the central interosseous membrane, the proximal interosseous membrane, and annular and quadrate ligaments. This was followed by the randomized evaluation of an annular ligament repair and three different ligament reconstructions, including a Bell Tawse reconstruction with triceps fascia (Bell Tawse reconstruction), a free tendon annular ligament reconstruction (Itadera reconstruction), and a free tendon anatomic annular ligament reconstruction (anatomic reconstruction). An optical tracking system was used to determine RH kinematics relative to the humerus. For all test states, the anterior translation of the RH relative to the capitellum was quantified as a measure of subluxation. Results: Sectioning the soft tissue stabilizers of the proximal radius produced a significant increase in anterior RH subluxation relative to the intact state (P < .001). The annular ligament repair was most effective at reducing anterior radial subluxation (P = 1.000). The Itadera reconstruction was the next most effective procedure at reducing anterior RH subluxation (P = 1.000) and was followed by the anatomic reconstruction (P = .192) and the Bell Tawse reconstructions (P = .015), respectively. Conclusion: Annular ligament repair was most effective in restoring normal RH stability; however, repair of this structure may not always be feasible as the tissues are often compromised by the injury and may not be reparable. The Itadera reconstruction was the most effective reconstruction technique at restoring RH stability and should be considered over alternative procedures when annular ligament repair is not feasible. These data also suggest that careful rehabilitation will be important postoperatively as residual RH instability can occur even with an anatomic reduction of the ulna and annular ligament repair or reconstruction.
format Article
id doaj-art-6c6f1f58e4b143389ab9ba8a286f5924
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-6383
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj-art-6c6f1f58e4b143389ab9ba8a286f59242025-01-12T05:26:07ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832025-01-0191313319An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fracturesKirk Vannitamby, MD0Cole T. Fleet, MESc1Carlos Prada, MD, MSc, FEBHS2James A. Johnson, PhD3Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC4Roth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, CanadaRoth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Canada; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, ChileRoth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Canada; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, CanadaRoth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Canada; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Canada; Corresponding author: Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Roth | McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph’s Health Care, 268 Grosvenor St., London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada.Background: Persistent or recurrent instability of the radial head (RH) remains a challenge in treating anterior Monteggia fractures despite anatomic restoration of the ulna. RH instability may be caused by the pull of the biceps muscle with rupture of the annular ligament and other soft tissue stabilizers of the proximal radius. Currently, the optimal method to stabilize the proximal radius is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare annular ligament repair with three different ligament reconstructions in restoring anterior RH stability. Methods: Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted on an elbow simulator in 90 degrees of flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation. Simulated sequential biceps loading was applied in 10 N increments up to a maximum biceps load of 150 N to generate an anteriorly directed force to the RH. Testing was first conducted in the native state with all soft tissue intact, followed by sectioning the central interosseous membrane, the proximal interosseous membrane, and annular and quadrate ligaments. This was followed by the randomized evaluation of an annular ligament repair and three different ligament reconstructions, including a Bell Tawse reconstruction with triceps fascia (Bell Tawse reconstruction), a free tendon annular ligament reconstruction (Itadera reconstruction), and a free tendon anatomic annular ligament reconstruction (anatomic reconstruction). An optical tracking system was used to determine RH kinematics relative to the humerus. For all test states, the anterior translation of the RH relative to the capitellum was quantified as a measure of subluxation. Results: Sectioning the soft tissue stabilizers of the proximal radius produced a significant increase in anterior RH subluxation relative to the intact state (P < .001). The annular ligament repair was most effective at reducing anterior radial subluxation (P = 1.000). The Itadera reconstruction was the next most effective procedure at reducing anterior RH subluxation (P = 1.000) and was followed by the anatomic reconstruction (P = .192) and the Bell Tawse reconstructions (P = .015), respectively. Conclusion: Annular ligament repair was most effective in restoring normal RH stability; however, repair of this structure may not always be feasible as the tissues are often compromised by the injury and may not be reparable. The Itadera reconstruction was the most effective reconstruction technique at restoring RH stability and should be considered over alternative procedures when annular ligament repair is not feasible. These data also suggest that careful rehabilitation will be important postoperatively as residual RH instability can occur even with an anatomic reduction of the ulna and annular ligament repair or reconstruction.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004791Anterior Monteggia fracturesRadial head subluxationAnnular ligament repairAnnular ligament reconstruction
spellingShingle Kirk Vannitamby, MD
Cole T. Fleet, MESc
Carlos Prada, MD, MSc, FEBHS
James A. Johnson, PhD
Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
JSES International
Anterior Monteggia fractures
Radial head subluxation
Annular ligament repair
Annular ligament reconstruction
title An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
title_full An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
title_fullStr An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
title_full_unstemmed An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
title_short An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior Monteggia fractures
title_sort in vitro biomechanical comparison of annular ligament repair and reconstructions to restore radial head stability in anterior monteggia fractures
topic Anterior Monteggia fractures
Radial head subluxation
Annular ligament repair
Annular ligament reconstruction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004791
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkvannitambymd aninvitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT coletfleetmesc aninvitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT carlospradamdmscfebhs aninvitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT jamesajohnsonphd aninvitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT grahamjwkingmdmscfrcsc aninvitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT kirkvannitambymd invitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT coletfleetmesc invitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT carlospradamdmscfebhs invitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT jamesajohnsonphd invitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures
AT grahamjwkingmdmscfrcsc invitrobiomechanicalcomparisonofannularligamentrepairandreconstructionstorestoreradialheadstabilityinanteriormonteggiafractures