MRI-guided clustering of patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease using self-organizing maps

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a phenotypically and pathologically heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder. This heterogeneity can be studied and disentangled using data-driven clustering techniques. Methods: We implemented a self-organizing map clustering algorithm on baseline volum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kellen K. Petersen, Bhargav T. Nallapu, Richard B. Lipton, Ellen Grober, Ali Ezzati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:NeuroImage: Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956024000333
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a phenotypically and pathologically heterogenous neurodegenerative disorder. This heterogeneity can be studied and disentangled using data-driven clustering techniques. Methods: We implemented a self-organizing map clustering algorithm on baseline volumetric MRI measures from nine brain regions of interest (ROIs) to cluster 1041 individuals enrolled in the placebo arm of the EXPEDITION3 trial. Volumetric MRI differences were compared among clusters. Demographics as well as baseline and longitudinal cognitive performance metrics were used to evaluate cluster characteristics. Results: Three distinct clusters, with an overall silhouette coefficient of 0.491, were identified based on MRI volumetrics. Cluster 1 (N = 400) had the largest baseline volumetric measures across all ROIs and the best cognitive performance at baseline. Cluster 2 (N = 269) had larger hippocampal and medial temporal lobe volumes, but smaller parietal lobe volumes in comparison with the third cluster (N = 372). Significant between-group mean differences were observed between Clusters 1 and 2 (difference, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.85 to 2.91; P < 0.001), Clusters 1 and 3 (difference, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.44; P < 0.001), but not between Clusters 2 and 3 (difference, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.11 to 1.02; P = 0.146) in ADAS-14. Conclusions: Volumetric MRI can be used to identify homogenous clusters of amyloid positive individuals with mild dementia. The groups identified differ in baseline and longitudinal characteristics. Cluster 1 shows little ADAS-14 change over the first 40 weeks of study on placebo treatment and may be unsuitable for identifying early benefits of treatment.
ISSN:2666-9560