The In-between Space

The territorial systematization in Romania in the second half of the twentieth century has profoundly influenced the morphology of the current urban fabric, due to the pace of construction imposed by the socialist regime and related to politically forced industrialization and urbanization, thus con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Romeo Emanuel Cuc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Docomomo International 2023-09-01
Series:Docomomo Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://docomomojournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849326718390632448
author Romeo Emanuel Cuc
author_facet Romeo Emanuel Cuc
author_sort Romeo Emanuel Cuc
collection DOAJ
description The territorial systematization in Romania in the second half of the twentieth century has profoundly influenced the morphology of the current urban fabric, due to the pace of construction imposed by the socialist regime and related to politically forced industrialization and urbanization, thus contributing to an urban society sensitive to the subject. This paper addresses the ways in which the public space, resulting from the construction of socialist mass housing, was used, questioning how public space can be (re)gained for today’s communities by understanding the disparity between the original, ordered socialist vision of housing and more informal appropriation patterns. The governmental approach to the urban development of socialist mass housing resulted in the occurrence of interstitial spaces which, having been of low development priority, were reclaimed by the nearby inhabitants, becoming free places for everyone and no one, territories that generated infinite possibilities for appropriation. Even though socialist mass housing developments were (and still are) associated with a sense of constraint, this situation generated the spontaneity with which inhabitants used the public space. In Romania, in the collective memory of generations, the iconic image of the space between the blocks is that of children playing and people socializing between grey buildings. With the fall of the communist regime, the responsibility of maintaining the buildings and the public space in-between was transferred to the new owners by selling the previously state-owned apartments to the population; in Romania, about 96% of homes are now privately owned. At a time when Romanian cities are facing a lack of quality public spaces, the in-between space in the mass housing neighborhoods has become a large parking area. Addressing how the public space can be (re)used must involve a clear understanding of past practices to generate context-sensitive reactions.
format Article
id doaj-art-6c2a014f8a3943febd050433c4b9e03e
institution Kabale University
issn 1380-3204
2773-1634
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Docomomo International
record_format Article
series Docomomo Journal
spelling doaj-art-6c2a014f8a3943febd050433c4b9e03e2025-08-20T03:48:06ZengDocomomo InternationalDocomomo Journal1380-32042773-16342023-09-0168The In-between SpaceRomeo Emanuel Cuc0Technical University of Cluj Napoca The territorial systematization in Romania in the second half of the twentieth century has profoundly influenced the morphology of the current urban fabric, due to the pace of construction imposed by the socialist regime and related to politically forced industrialization and urbanization, thus contributing to an urban society sensitive to the subject. This paper addresses the ways in which the public space, resulting from the construction of socialist mass housing, was used, questioning how public space can be (re)gained for today’s communities by understanding the disparity between the original, ordered socialist vision of housing and more informal appropriation patterns. The governmental approach to the urban development of socialist mass housing resulted in the occurrence of interstitial spaces which, having been of low development priority, were reclaimed by the nearby inhabitants, becoming free places for everyone and no one, territories that generated infinite possibilities for appropriation. Even though socialist mass housing developments were (and still are) associated with a sense of constraint, this situation generated the spontaneity with which inhabitants used the public space. In Romania, in the collective memory of generations, the iconic image of the space between the blocks is that of children playing and people socializing between grey buildings. With the fall of the communist regime, the responsibility of maintaining the buildings and the public space in-between was transferred to the new owners by selling the previously state-owned apartments to the population; in Romania, about 96% of homes are now privately owned. At a time when Romanian cities are facing a lack of quality public spaces, the in-between space in the mass housing neighborhoods has become a large parking area. Addressing how the public space can be (re)used must involve a clear understanding of past practices to generate context-sensitive reactions. https://docomomojournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/574socialist mass-housing, uniformity, collective memory, spontaneity, playground
spellingShingle Romeo Emanuel Cuc
The In-between Space
Docomomo Journal
socialist mass-housing, uniformity, collective memory, spontaneity, playground
title The In-between Space
title_full The In-between Space
title_fullStr The In-between Space
title_full_unstemmed The In-between Space
title_short The In-between Space
title_sort in between space
topic socialist mass-housing, uniformity, collective memory, spontaneity, playground
url https://docomomojournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/574
work_keys_str_mv AT romeoemanuelcuc theinbetweenspace
AT romeoemanuelcuc inbetweenspace