Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Tianbo Liu,* Li Ma,* Yan Wang, Bo Wang, Yue Xu, Ying Gao, Ge Yu, Jialiang Gao, Jie Chen Department of Gynecological Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorres...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/robot-assisted-surgery-for-endometrial-cancer-using-kangduo-versus-da--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849429400649465856 |
|---|---|
| author | Liu T Ma L Wang Y Wang B Xu Y Gao Y Yu G Gao J Chen J |
| author_facet | Liu T Ma L Wang Y Wang B Xu Y Gao Y Yu G Gao J Chen J |
| author_sort | Liu T |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Tianbo Liu,&ast; Li Ma,&ast; Yan Wang, Bo Wang, Yue Xu, Ying Gao, Ge Yu, Jialiang Gao, Jie Chen Department of Gynecological Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jie Chen, Email cj2365255@126.comBackground: With the advancement of medical technology, robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as a promising approach for the management of endometrial cancer (EC). This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of two robotic systems—Kangduo (KD-RAS) and Da Vinci (DV-RAS)—in the treatment of EC.Methods: This study included patients with stage T1 EC who underwent robotic-assisted surgery using either the Kangduo or Da Vinci system at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted on their perioperative clinical data, encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters.Results: A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study, including 125 in the KD-RAS group and 86 in the DV-RAS group. The surgical success rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant differences observed in preoperative baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, or Clavien-Dindo grade I/II complications (P > 0.05). However, the KD-RAS group exhibited longer operation time, console time, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay compared to the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05). Notably, both total hospitalization costs and surgical expenses were significantly lower in the KD-RAS group than in the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The Kangduo robotic system demonstrates comparable efficacy and equivalent safety profiles to the Da Vinci system, supporting its non-inferiority in clinical performance for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.Keywords: endometrial cancer, Kangduo robotic system, Da Vinci robotic system, efficacy, safety |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6c0e52a314c84ebd9f98b0e9b968771c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1178-2390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare |
| spelling | doaj-art-6c0e52a314c84ebd9f98b0e9b968771c2025-08-20T03:28:22ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare1178-23902025-07-01Volume 18Issue 138913900104574Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative StudyLiu T0Ma L1Wang Y2Wang BXu Y3Gao YYu G4Gao J5Chen J6Department of GynecologyDepartment of Gynecological OncologyHarbin Medical University Cancer HospitalHarbin Medical University Cancer HospitalDepartment of GynecologyGynecology 5thDepartment of Gynecological OncologyTianbo Liu,&ast; Li Ma,&ast; Yan Wang, Bo Wang, Yue Xu, Ying Gao, Ge Yu, Jialiang Gao, Jie Chen Department of Gynecological Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jie Chen, Email cj2365255@126.comBackground: With the advancement of medical technology, robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as a promising approach for the management of endometrial cancer (EC). This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of two robotic systems—Kangduo (KD-RAS) and Da Vinci (DV-RAS)—in the treatment of EC.Methods: This study included patients with stage T1 EC who underwent robotic-assisted surgery using either the Kangduo or Da Vinci system at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted on their perioperative clinical data, encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters.Results: A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study, including 125 in the KD-RAS group and 86 in the DV-RAS group. The surgical success rate was 100% in both groups, with no significant differences observed in preoperative baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood loss, transfusion requirements, or Clavien-Dindo grade I/II complications (P > 0.05). However, the KD-RAS group exhibited longer operation time, console time, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay compared to the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05). Notably, both total hospitalization costs and surgical expenses were significantly lower in the KD-RAS group than in the DV-RAS group (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The Kangduo robotic system demonstrates comparable efficacy and equivalent safety profiles to the Da Vinci system, supporting its non-inferiority in clinical performance for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.Keywords: endometrial cancer, Kangduo robotic system, Da Vinci robotic system, efficacy, safetyhttps://www.dovepress.com/robot-assisted-surgery-for-endometrial-cancer-using-kangduo-versus-da--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDHEndometrial cancerKangduo robotic systemDa Vinci robotic systemefficacysafety |
| spellingShingle | Liu T Ma L Wang Y Wang B Xu Y Gao Y Yu G Gao J Chen J Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Endometrial cancer Kangduo robotic system Da Vinci robotic system efficacy safety |
| title | Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study |
| title_full | Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study |
| title_fullStr | Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study |
| title_short | Robot-Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Using KangDuo versus Da Vinci Systems: A Retrospective Comparative Study |
| title_sort | robot assisted surgery for endometrial cancer using kangduo versus da vinci systems a retrospective comparative study |
| topic | Endometrial cancer Kangduo robotic system Da Vinci robotic system efficacy safety |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/robot-assisted-surgery-for-endometrial-cancer-using-kangduo-versus-da--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JMDH |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT liut robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT mal robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT wangy robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT wangb robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT xuy robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT gaoy robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT yug robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT gaoj robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT chenj robotassistedsurgeryforendometrialcancerusingkangduoversusdavincisystemsaretrospectivecomparativestudy |