Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis
This study explores the boundaries that shape the usefulness of digital interactions in higher education. Utilising fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we hypothesise how the conditions of technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions explain the usefulness of digi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523153 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849430355656835072 |
|---|---|
| author | Symeon Mandrinos Constance Liew Sat Lin |
| author_facet | Symeon Mandrinos Constance Liew Sat Lin |
| author_sort | Symeon Mandrinos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study explores the boundaries that shape the usefulness of digital interactions in higher education. Utilising fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we hypothesise how the conditions of technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions explain the usefulness of digital (blended and online) interactions. Our findings reveal that autonomy contributes to a space bubble where the concept of boundary – particularly represented by the clopen state – works together to explain usefulness. The relationship between autonomy and usefulness posits that when autonomy is increased under complexity, the clopen state (boundary) regarding usefulness is a fuzzy but necessary condition to the outcome. Contrary to prior findings that label technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions as counterproductive, our study acknowledges that boundaries do not diminish usefulness; instead, they can enhance digital interactions when these conditions are necessary. We identify critical gaps regarding the interplay of these conditions and advocate for larger, more diverse studies to further elucidate the complexities surrounding technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6be301492c01466d9d763291ccacf548 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2331-186X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-6be301492c01466d9d763291ccacf5482025-08-20T03:28:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2025-12-0112110.1080/2331186X.2025.2523153Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysisSymeon Mandrinos0Constance Liew Sat Lin1Department of Business, Swinburne University of Technology, Kuching, Sarawak, MalaysiaDepartment of Medicine, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MalaysiaThis study explores the boundaries that shape the usefulness of digital interactions in higher education. Utilising fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), we hypothesise how the conditions of technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions explain the usefulness of digital (blended and online) interactions. Our findings reveal that autonomy contributes to a space bubble where the concept of boundary – particularly represented by the clopen state – works together to explain usefulness. The relationship between autonomy and usefulness posits that when autonomy is increased under complexity, the clopen state (boundary) regarding usefulness is a fuzzy but necessary condition to the outcome. Contrary to prior findings that label technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions as counterproductive, our study acknowledges that boundaries do not diminish usefulness; instead, they can enhance digital interactions when these conditions are necessary. We identify critical gaps regarding the interplay of these conditions and advocate for larger, more diverse studies to further elucidate the complexities surrounding technology dependence, self-regulated autonomy, and restrictions.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523153Boundarycausal (counterfactual) dependencefuzzinessrestrictionsself-regulated autonomyusefulness |
| spellingShingle | Symeon Mandrinos Constance Liew Sat Lin Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis Cogent Education Boundary causal (counterfactual) dependence fuzziness restrictions self-regulated autonomy usefulness |
| title | Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis |
| title_full | Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis |
| title_fullStr | Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis |
| title_short | Boundaries in digital interactions in higher education: a comparative analysis |
| title_sort | boundaries in digital interactions in higher education a comparative analysis |
| topic | Boundary causal (counterfactual) dependence fuzziness restrictions self-regulated autonomy usefulness |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523153 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT symeonmandrinos boundariesindigitalinteractionsinhighereducationacomparativeanalysis AT constanceliewsatlin boundariesindigitalinteractionsinhighereducationacomparativeanalysis |