Evaluation of Field-Diffusion Charging Models for Airborne Suspended Particles Charged by Corona Ions: Sum of Charge Quantities and Sum of Charging Rates

To evaluate field-diffusion charging models, a systematic comparative study is conducted in this paper. A field-diffusion charge quantity sum model (FDCQSM) and a field-diffusion charging rate sum model (FDCRSM) are introduced in which the Maxwell-Wagner relaxation model for unipolar field charging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kun He, Xiaoqian Ma, Li Xie, Yong Ju, Jiayu Lu, Luxing Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: China electric power research institute 2025-01-01
Series:CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9862570/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate field-diffusion charging models, a systematic comparative study is conducted in this paper. A field-diffusion charge quantity sum model (FDCQSM) and a field-diffusion charging rate sum model (FDCRSM) are introduced in which the Maxwell-Wagner relaxation model for unipolar field charging is proposed to extend to bipolar charging. The predictions of the two models are compared with the experimental results reported in literature over wide ranges of particle diameters and electric fields. The results show that the FDCQSM is in good consistency with the experiments, while the FDCRSM performs well only if either diffusion charging or field charging dominates. Moreover, the physical meaning of the FDCRSM, the effects of ion property and the particle's conductivity on the particle charge, and applicability of the FDCQSM are discussed. The outcome, in which FDCRSM works badly when field charging and diffusion charging are important, indicates that it is likely to be as factual as FDCQSM. And FDCQSM seems to be valid in the study of the effects of aerosols on the electrical environment around high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission lines, while FDCRSM is not recommended.
ISSN:2096-0042