Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bing-li Liu, Guo-ping Yin, Feng-fei Li, Yun Hu, Jin-dan Wu, Mao-yuan Chen, Lei Ye, Xiao-fei Su, Jian-hua Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Endocrinology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2087960
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554423773036544
author Bing-li Liu
Guo-ping Yin
Feng-fei Li
Yun Hu
Jin-dan Wu
Mao-yuan Chen
Lei Ye
Xiao-fei Su
Jian-hua Ma
author_facet Bing-li Liu
Guo-ping Yin
Feng-fei Li
Yun Hu
Jin-dan Wu
Mao-yuan Chen
Lei Ye
Xiao-fei Su
Jian-hua Ma
author_sort Bing-li Liu
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups: group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.
format Article
id doaj-art-6bb938eb94ab4fcdaa9a123aed5735c2
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8337
1687-8345
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Endocrinology
spelling doaj-art-6bb938eb94ab4fcdaa9a123aed5735c22025-02-03T05:51:37ZengWileyInternational Journal of Endocrinology1687-83371687-83452018-01-01201810.1155/2018/20879602087960Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 DiabetesBing-li Liu0Guo-ping Yin1Feng-fei Li2Yun Hu3Jin-dan Wu4Mao-yuan Chen5Lei Ye6Xiao-fei Su7Jian-hua Ma8Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaNational Heart Centre Singapore, National Heart Research Institute Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaObjective. To compare the effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aspart (NovoRapid) and lispro (Prandilin) on glycemic variations by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients within newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin intensive therapy. Methods. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed T2DM and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) above 9% was hospitalized and randomly divided into two groups: group Asp (NovoRapid group) and group Lis (Prandilin group). They all received CSII and metformin therapy. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. C-peptide and insulin and fructosamine were determined. CGMS was continuously applied for 4 days after reaching the glycemic target. Results. There were no significant differences in daily dosages of insulin, fasting plasma C-P and 2 h postprandial C-P and insulin, and fructosamine at the baseline and endpoint between the groups Asp and Lis. No significant differences were seen in the 24 h mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of the MBG (SDBG), fasting blood glucose, number of glycemic excursion (NGE), and the incidence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUC) of glucose above 10.0 mmol/L or the decremental area over the curve (AOC) of glucose below 3.9 mmol/L between the two groups. Conclusions. Lispro and aspart had the similar ability to control the glycemic variations in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR-IPR-17010338.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2087960
spellingShingle Bing-li Liu
Guo-ping Yin
Feng-fei Li
Yun Hu
Jin-dan Wu
Mao-yuan Chen
Lei Ye
Xiao-fei Su
Jian-hua Ma
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
International Journal of Endocrinology
title Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
title_full Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
title_short Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Lispro and Aspart Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of lispro and aspart evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring system in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2087960
work_keys_str_mv AT bingliliu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT guopingyin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT fengfeili comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT yunhu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT jindanwu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT maoyuanchen comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT leiye comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT xiaofeisu comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes
AT jianhuama comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflisproandaspartevaluatedbycontinuousglucosemonitoringsysteminpatientswithnewlydiagnosedtype2diabetes