Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset

Land surface models (LSMs) play a crucial role in climate prediction and carbon cycle assessment. To ensure their reliability, it is crucial to evaluate their performance in simulating key processes, such as evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP), across various temporal scales...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bofeng Pan, Xiaolu Wu, Xitian Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1400
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850077786486603776
author Bofeng Pan
Xiaolu Wu
Xitian Cai
author_facet Bofeng Pan
Xiaolu Wu
Xitian Cai
author_sort Bofeng Pan
collection DOAJ
description Land surface models (LSMs) play a crucial role in climate prediction and carbon cycle assessment. To ensure their reliability, it is crucial to evaluate their performance in simulating key processes, such as evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP), across various temporal scales and vegetation types. This study systematically evaluates the performance of the newly modernized Noah-MP LSM version 5.0 in simulating water and carbon fluxes, specifically ET and GPP, across temporal scales ranging from half-hourly (capturing diurnal cycles) to annual using observational data from 105 sites within the globally FLUXNET2015 dataset. The results reveal that Noah-MP effectively captured the overall variability of both ET and GPP, particularly at short temporal scales. The model successfully simulated the diurnal and seasonal cycles of both fluxes, though cumulative errors increased at the annual scale. Diurnally, the largest simulation biases typically occurred around noon; while, seasonally, biases were smallest in winter. Performance varied significantly across vegetation types. For ET, the simulations were most accurate for open shrublands and deciduous broadleaf forests, while showing the largest deviation for woody savannas. Conversely, GPP simulations were most accurate for wetlands and closed shrublands, showing the largest deviation for evergreen broadleaf forests. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis stratified by the climate background revealed that ET simulations failed to capture inter-annual variability in the temperate and continental zones, while GPP was severely overestimated in arid and temperate climates. This study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of Noah-MP in simulating water and carbon fluxes, providing valuable insights for future model improvements.
format Article
id doaj-art-6bb4d53c4ed04b2e81a014fc50a58cc3
institution DOAJ
issn 2073-445X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj-art-6bb4d53c4ed04b2e81a014fc50a58cc32025-08-20T02:45:43ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2025-07-01147140010.3390/land14071400Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET DatasetBofeng Pan0Xiaolu Wu1Xitian Cai2School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, ChinaLand surface models (LSMs) play a crucial role in climate prediction and carbon cycle assessment. To ensure their reliability, it is crucial to evaluate their performance in simulating key processes, such as evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP), across various temporal scales and vegetation types. This study systematically evaluates the performance of the newly modernized Noah-MP LSM version 5.0 in simulating water and carbon fluxes, specifically ET and GPP, across temporal scales ranging from half-hourly (capturing diurnal cycles) to annual using observational data from 105 sites within the globally FLUXNET2015 dataset. The results reveal that Noah-MP effectively captured the overall variability of both ET and GPP, particularly at short temporal scales. The model successfully simulated the diurnal and seasonal cycles of both fluxes, though cumulative errors increased at the annual scale. Diurnally, the largest simulation biases typically occurred around noon; while, seasonally, biases were smallest in winter. Performance varied significantly across vegetation types. For ET, the simulations were most accurate for open shrublands and deciduous broadleaf forests, while showing the largest deviation for woody savannas. Conversely, GPP simulations were most accurate for wetlands and closed shrublands, showing the largest deviation for evergreen broadleaf forests. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis stratified by the climate background revealed that ET simulations failed to capture inter-annual variability in the temperate and continental zones, while GPP was severely overestimated in arid and temperate climates. This study identifies the strengths and weaknesses of Noah-MP in simulating water and carbon fluxes, providing valuable insights for future model improvements.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1400evapotranspirationgross primary productivitymodel evaluationNoah-MP LSMwater and carbon fluxes
spellingShingle Bofeng Pan
Xiaolu Wu
Xitian Cai
Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
Land
evapotranspiration
gross primary productivity
model evaluation
Noah-MP LSM
water and carbon fluxes
title Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
title_full Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
title_fullStr Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
title_short Evaluation of Noah-MP Land Surface Model-Simulated Water and Carbon Fluxes Using the FLUXNET Dataset
title_sort evaluation of noah mp land surface model simulated water and carbon fluxes using the fluxnet dataset
topic evapotranspiration
gross primary productivity
model evaluation
Noah-MP LSM
water and carbon fluxes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1400
work_keys_str_mv AT bofengpan evaluationofnoahmplandsurfacemodelsimulatedwaterandcarbonfluxesusingthefluxnetdataset
AT xiaoluwu evaluationofnoahmplandsurfacemodelsimulatedwaterandcarbonfluxesusingthefluxnetdataset
AT xitiancai evaluationofnoahmplandsurfacemodelsimulatedwaterandcarbonfluxesusingthefluxnetdataset