Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans

Aim To critically assess the evidence on micrografting technology to evaluate its effectiveness when used alone or as an adjunct to regenerative treatment in various medical and dental applications. Methods Seven electronic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rawan Almujaydil, Yumeng Yan, Sandra Kuswandani, Faisal Alotaibi, Jeanie Suvan, Linh Nguyen, Francesco D’Aiuto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of International Medical Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251337859
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850270749583998976
author Rawan Almujaydil
Yumeng Yan
Sandra Kuswandani
Faisal Alotaibi
Jeanie Suvan
Linh Nguyen
Francesco D’Aiuto
author_facet Rawan Almujaydil
Yumeng Yan
Sandra Kuswandani
Faisal Alotaibi
Jeanie Suvan
Linh Nguyen
Francesco D’Aiuto
author_sort Rawan Almujaydil
collection DOAJ
description Aim To critically assess the evidence on micrografting technology to evaluate its effectiveness when used alone or as an adjunct to regenerative treatment in various medical and dental applications. Methods Seven electronic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature EBSCOhost, Web of Science Core Collection, System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, were searched until 15 July 2024. Risk of bias assessment and qualitative and quantitative (random-effect models) analyses were conducted. Results A total of 55 studies were identified. Most studies (n = 24) reported on burns, followed by 10 studies on ulcers/wounds, 7 on androgenetic alopecia, 3 on vitiligo, 3 on cartilage and bone defects, and 1 on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Dental applications included sinus lift (three studies), socket preservation (two studies), and intrabody defects (two studies). A meta-analysis of four studies on the management of burns confirmed that micrografting led to reduced healing periods compared with other grafting techniques (weighted mean difference: −0.98, 95% confidence interval: −1.84 to −0.12, p = 0.03), with a high level of heterogeneity (83.57%) and risk of bias. Conclusion Micrografting technology may lead to shorter healing time and improved patient morbidity.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ba66ebca61d4cf2ac74e1dd756a7b0b
institution OA Journals
issn 1473-2300
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of International Medical Research
spelling doaj-art-6ba66ebca61d4cf2ac74e1dd756a7b0b2025-08-20T01:52:26ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002025-05-015310.1177/03000605251337859Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humansRawan AlmujaydilYumeng YanSandra KuswandaniFaisal AlotaibiJeanie SuvanLinh NguyenFrancesco D’AiutoAim To critically assess the evidence on micrografting technology to evaluate its effectiveness when used alone or as an adjunct to regenerative treatment in various medical and dental applications. Methods Seven electronic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline Ovid, Embase Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature EBSCOhost, Web of Science Core Collection, System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, and Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, were searched until 15 July 2024. Risk of bias assessment and qualitative and quantitative (random-effect models) analyses were conducted. Results A total of 55 studies were identified. Most studies (n = 24) reported on burns, followed by 10 studies on ulcers/wounds, 7 on androgenetic alopecia, 3 on vitiligo, 3 on cartilage and bone defects, and 1 on coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Dental applications included sinus lift (three studies), socket preservation (two studies), and intrabody defects (two studies). A meta-analysis of four studies on the management of burns confirmed that micrografting led to reduced healing periods compared with other grafting techniques (weighted mean difference: −0.98, 95% confidence interval: −1.84 to −0.12, p = 0.03), with a high level of heterogeneity (83.57%) and risk of bias. Conclusion Micrografting technology may lead to shorter healing time and improved patient morbidity.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251337859
spellingShingle Rawan Almujaydil
Yumeng Yan
Sandra Kuswandani
Faisal Alotaibi
Jeanie Suvan
Linh Nguyen
Francesco D’Aiuto
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
Journal of International Medical Research
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
title_sort systematic review and meta analysis of the use of micrografting technology in humans
url https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251337859
work_keys_str_mv AT rawanalmujaydil systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT yumengyan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT sandrakuswandani systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT faisalalotaibi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT jeaniesuvan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT linhnguyen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans
AT francescodaiuto systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheuseofmicrograftingtechnologyinhumans