Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers

Abstract Background As more specialties have begun to use Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in patient care, hospitals and healthcare systems have been investing increasing resources in POCUS infrastructure (training, equipment, and administration). Since each specialty uses different POCUS applicati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dana M. Resop, Brian Bales, Rebecca G. Theophanous, Jessica Koehler, Jeremy S. Boyd, Michael J. Mader, Jason P. Williams, Robert Nathanson, Zahir Basrai, Elizabeth K. Haro, Rahul Khosla, Erin Wetherbee, Harald Sauthoff, Nilam J. Soni, Christopher K. Schott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-05-01
Series:The Ultrasound Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00398-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850125534178050048
author Dana M. Resop
Brian Bales
Rebecca G. Theophanous
Jessica Koehler
Jeremy S. Boyd
Michael J. Mader
Jason P. Williams
Robert Nathanson
Zahir Basrai
Elizabeth K. Haro
Rahul Khosla
Erin Wetherbee
Harald Sauthoff
Nilam J. Soni
Christopher K. Schott
author_facet Dana M. Resop
Brian Bales
Rebecca G. Theophanous
Jessica Koehler
Jeremy S. Boyd
Michael J. Mader
Jason P. Williams
Robert Nathanson
Zahir Basrai
Elizabeth K. Haro
Rahul Khosla
Erin Wetherbee
Harald Sauthoff
Nilam J. Soni
Christopher K. Schott
author_sort Dana M. Resop
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As more specialties have begun to use Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in patient care, hospitals and healthcare systems have been investing increasing resources in POCUS infrastructure (training, equipment, and administration). Since each specialty uses different POCUS applications, healthcare systems seek to identify commonalities and differences between specialties to make thoughtful investments in POCUS infrastructure to support each specialty’s use of POCUS while minimizing redundancies. Historically, past studies have focused on POCUS use in individual specialties, primarily emergency medicine and critical care, but comparative studies of different specialties are needed to guide investment in POCUS infrastructure and bolster POCUS implementation across healthcare systems. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in the United States and compared data from 5 different specialties on current usage, training needs, and barriers to POCUS implementation. Results Data were collected from facility chiefs of staff (n = 130; 100% response rate) and chiefs of emergency medicine (n = 101; 92% response rate), critical care (n = 93; 83% response rate), hospital medicine (n = 105; 90% response rate), anesthesiology (n = 96; 77% response rate), and surgery (n = 104; 95% response rate). All specialties surveyed reported current POCUS use (surgery 54%, hospital medicine 64%, anesthesiology 83%, emergency medicine 90%, and critical care 93%) but more importantly, a greater desire for training was seen. Procedural POCUS applications were most often used by all specialties, despite decreased procedural POCUS use since 2015 for all specialties except critical care. Diagnostic POCUS use generally increased from 2015 to 2020, although use of specific POCUS applications varied significantly between specialties. Barriers limiting POCUS use included lack of training (53–80%), access to ultrasound equipment (25–57%), and POCUS infrastructure (36–65%). Conclusions From 2015 to 2020, POCUS use increased significantly in emergency medicine, critical care, internal medicine, anesthesiology, and surgery, although use of specific applications varied significantly between specialties. Lack of training and POCUS infrastructure were common barriers to POCUS use across specialties. Desire for training exceeded current use for several POCUS applications. These findings can guide implementation and standardization of  POCUS use  in hospitals and healthcare systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-6ba42e1f12e041a582910d2f2d19793a
institution OA Journals
issn 2524-8987
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Ultrasound Journal
spelling doaj-art-6ba42e1f12e041a582910d2f2d19793a2025-08-20T02:34:06ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872025-05-0117111110.1186/s13089-024-00398-xMultispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centersDana M. Resop0Brian Bales1Rebecca G. Theophanous2Jessica Koehler3Jeremy S. Boyd4Michael J. Mader5Jason P. Williams6Robert Nathanson7Zahir Basrai8Elizabeth K. Haro9Rahul Khosla10Erin Wetherbee11Harald Sauthoff12Nilam J. Soni13Christopher K. Schott14Department of Emergency Medicine, University of WisconsinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical CenterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke UniversityDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical SchoolDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical CenterResearch Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care SystemMedicine Service, Atlanta VA Medical CenterMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care SystemEmergency Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care SystemDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, George Washington UniversityPulmonary Section, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care SystemMedicine Service, VA NY Harbor Healthcare SystemMedicine Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care SystemCritical Care Service, VA Pittsburgh Health Care Systems, University Drive CAbstract Background As more specialties have begun to use Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in patient care, hospitals and healthcare systems have been investing increasing resources in POCUS infrastructure (training, equipment, and administration). Since each specialty uses different POCUS applications, healthcare systems seek to identify commonalities and differences between specialties to make thoughtful investments in POCUS infrastructure to support each specialty’s use of POCUS while minimizing redundancies. Historically, past studies have focused on POCUS use in individual specialties, primarily emergency medicine and critical care, but comparative studies of different specialties are needed to guide investment in POCUS infrastructure and bolster POCUS implementation across healthcare systems. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in the United States and compared data from 5 different specialties on current usage, training needs, and barriers to POCUS implementation. Results Data were collected from facility chiefs of staff (n = 130; 100% response rate) and chiefs of emergency medicine (n = 101; 92% response rate), critical care (n = 93; 83% response rate), hospital medicine (n = 105; 90% response rate), anesthesiology (n = 96; 77% response rate), and surgery (n = 104; 95% response rate). All specialties surveyed reported current POCUS use (surgery 54%, hospital medicine 64%, anesthesiology 83%, emergency medicine 90%, and critical care 93%) but more importantly, a greater desire for training was seen. Procedural POCUS applications were most often used by all specialties, despite decreased procedural POCUS use since 2015 for all specialties except critical care. Diagnostic POCUS use generally increased from 2015 to 2020, although use of specific POCUS applications varied significantly between specialties. Barriers limiting POCUS use included lack of training (53–80%), access to ultrasound equipment (25–57%), and POCUS infrastructure (36–65%). Conclusions From 2015 to 2020, POCUS use increased significantly in emergency medicine, critical care, internal medicine, anesthesiology, and surgery, although use of specific applications varied significantly between specialties. Lack of training and POCUS infrastructure were common barriers to POCUS use across specialties. Desire for training exceeded current use for several POCUS applications. These findings can guide implementation and standardization of  POCUS use  in hospitals and healthcare systems.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00398-xPoint of care ultrasoundPOCUSBarriersTrainingSurveyVA
spellingShingle Dana M. Resop
Brian Bales
Rebecca G. Theophanous
Jessica Koehler
Jeremy S. Boyd
Michael J. Mader
Jason P. Williams
Robert Nathanson
Zahir Basrai
Elizabeth K. Haro
Rahul Khosla
Erin Wetherbee
Harald Sauthoff
Nilam J. Soni
Christopher K. Schott
Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
The Ultrasound Journal
Point of care ultrasound
POCUS
Barriers
Training
Survey
VA
title Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
title_full Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
title_fullStr Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
title_full_unstemmed Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
title_short Multispecialty comparison of point-of-care-ultrasound use, training, and barriers: a national survey of VA medical centers
title_sort multispecialty comparison of point of care ultrasound use training and barriers a national survey of va medical centers
topic Point of care ultrasound
POCUS
Barriers
Training
Survey
VA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-024-00398-x
work_keys_str_mv AT danamresop multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT brianbales multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT rebeccagtheophanous multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT jessicakoehler multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT jeremysboyd multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT michaeljmader multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT jasonpwilliams multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT robertnathanson multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT zahirbasrai multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT elizabethkharo multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT rahulkhosla multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT erinwetherbee multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT haraldsauthoff multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT nilamjsoni multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters
AT christopherkschott multispecialtycomparisonofpointofcareultrasoundusetrainingandbarriersanationalsurveyofvamedicalcenters